Brad Pitt will be the man in the middle between Angelina Jolie and his mom at the dinner table this Thursday — and if you believe some of the reports, there is no love lost between these two ladies.
Photoshopping pregnant women for magazines presents an unrealistic portrayal of pregnancy that could make everyday pregnant women feel badly about their own bods
You never hear people say The Other Man stole someone's wife, and men are never referred to as home wreckers. It's because the appeal of a catfight is apparently news worthy.
"My wife and I are both Libertarian; she was a Democrat and I was a Republican, and we both met in the middle somewhere."
Inspired by such high-profile cyclists as Obama, Fey and Einstein, I've set to work amassing a comprehensive archive of 100 people we know, love--perhaps even despise--atop the bike.
Star magazine has learned that Thanksgivingate at the Pitts was so much the pits that Brad's mother, Jane, is pulling the first wife card. She has invited Brad's ex, Jen Aniston, who she still considers family, to spend Christmas in Missouri.
One can't help but hope that some mechanical god of yore would appear on screen, wiping the whole mess of characters out and thereby ending the movie at that exact moment...but it never does.
Here's something you don't see very often in our Photoshopped, airburshed and Dermablended world: stretch marks. And not just a couple discreetly tuc...
Who said that the era of the Hollywood gentleman ended with the passing of Cary Grant and Jimmy Stewart? There is evidence that menschdom is alive and well from London to La-La Land.
If a Haitian woman knows a mud cookie, a bacteria-filled pastry, is not good for her then why does she eat it? The simple answer -- she has few options.
It is no longer enough to just be thin. You must be skeletal. Lumpy thin, a la Kirsten Dunst, is so nineties. Anyone can starve, darlings. But not everyone can make their bones pop just so.
What's really at stake isn't whether the story of Spear's pregnancy is true or not, but the way the news is delivered and then the way that pregnancy and birth are treated by the media and public.
This weekend on Long Beach, NY, I learned two things: one, umbrellas bought at the dollar store cannot sustain winds over 1.5 knots (sorry nearby fami...
Last week a mix of water and sanitation experts gathered for World Water Week in Stockholm, Sweden to mull over the world's biggest public health crisis. The problem is that not enough people paid attention.
Joan Allen is a quiet, steady, pre-possessing performer who combines her all-too-evident God-given skill with an understated style and allure, and also happens to make lots of extremely good pictures.
Like the nagging relative or the smug married friend, this inquiring mind was asking of each of these unmarried couples, "So why aren't you married?"
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Hechizera
No - it doesn't bother us that the Aniston/Pitt marriage ended. Most marriages end. Maybe they were not compatible. BUT YOU JUST DONT GET IT. Aniston has go nothing to do with it.
What bothers most is jolies affair, the lies the obvious manipulation of the media and her attempt to insult to our intelligence. We just dont buy into her act.
However it must tear you apart that youve been had by jolie - that you have been taken for a fool, manipulated by her, and lied too. You even tried to discredit the NYT and the writer to keep the faith in bradgeloonidom. Do you really think that justjarred /people have more substance then NYT.
You are a joke Hechizera - but why dont you go ahead and insult Aniston to make you feel better about jolie.
People Magazine has just issued a statement through the senior editor that the NY Times story is completely false. You can read it on justjared.buzznet.com. Going to be fun to watch how this plays out. Wonder how the Times likes their crow -- roasted, fried or fricasseed?
Off course they would say that bradgeloonie. They will deny and so will jolie.
Hechizera - your not just naive - your also stupid
Contrary to the Times" reporter"s (I hesitate to use the term journalist) belief, the United Nations High Commission on Refugees does not schedule field missions to Pakistan, Afghanistan or anywhere else to accommodate a celebrity"s publicity needs. Did Ms./Mr. Barnes even try to confirm with the UNHCR whether Ms. Angelina Jolie in fact initiated either trip?
There are a lot of assertions made and very little to back them up, reliance on only a single source or unnamed sources not independently verified, in a shoddily reported but carefully crafted hit piece against Ms. Jolie. Since when has the New York Times considered a former editor-in-chief of tabloid rags Star and Us Weekly a reliable source? It didn"t even identify the magazines as tabloids well known for inventing stories out of thin air, and it certainly didn"t reveal the conflict of interest between Ms. Fuller in her former capacity as EIC of these rags and tabloid target/subject Jolie.
And certainly, as the article even said, "[w]hile all celebrities seek to manipulate their public images to one degree or another [otherwise known as spin " engaged in by all public figures includimg politicians, CEOs, and even Big Media]," why single out Ms. Jolie " other than that she"s a cash cow for circulation and internet traffic? Why not name some names and give some examples? The least the Times could do is one other article examining the rest of this phenomena, a separate article for each isn"t necessary .