If We Drill in the US, We Don't Get the Oil
Everyone seems to assume that if we drill for oil in the US, we will get the oil and won't be dependent on foreign oil anymore. But we won't get anything, Exxon-Mobil will.
Everyone seems to assume that if we drill for oil in the US, we will get the oil and won't be dependent on foreign oil anymore. But we won't get anything, Exxon-Mobil will.
In essence the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, rather than being our oil safety valve, has become a welfare program for the oil industry and one of the nation's most outrageous boondoggles.
Are we destined to soon be crushed by the dual hammer of Peak Oil and Global Warming, crippling our civilization forever?
As Sudan's President Omar al-Bashir boasted, "Just when some countries gave us sanctions, God gave us oil." It's expensive to wage genocide.
The Saudis are increasingly turning to Russia and China as their new oil and gas partners, dumping longstanding relationships with once-favored American oil companies.
Deepak Chopra went on CNN Wednesday night to give his take on the Mumbai attacks and how to prevent similar attacks in the future, but producers cut Chopra off when he started to get too controversial.
Clearly something is afoot in the attempt to quash any and all discussion of the "Abiotic Oil Theory."
Love her or hate her, you have to admit that John McCain's selection of Sarah Palin for the Republican ticket this year was without any doubt the boldest political tactic of the year.
Are oil interests now Iraq's fourth stakeholder group, and wasn't that always the objective? Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan certainly thinks so.
Supply and demand is one factor in determining price, but another factor used to be called "competition." Again, I'm not an economist, but I'm pretty sure that was supposed to drive prices down.
The Obama camp's explanation as to why the windfall profits tax has been dropped is inconsistent with the facts and the actual series of events.
As the American dollar declines and bombs drop on Gaza, the likeliness of regional countries becoming drawn into the conflict are mounting.
By now you have no doubt read a dozen reviews of 2008 and projections for 2009, all pure guesses for the latter, unless someone was carefully predicti...
This is easily the best energy plan ever put forward by a nominee of either party. By comparison, the plan of John "Nothing but Nukes" McCain plan is a joke.
It's the oil-fueled spending boom that accounts for the popularity of the Chavez regime, and there's nothing progressive about it.
Devising new and hilariously clever agitprop words like "Defeatocrats" is clearly more patriotic than actually addressing the principle source of global and domestic instability.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Convincing America of the need to abandon oil as America's main energy source is one area where Mr. Obama's inspirational charisma will bear fruit. He has the ability and (soon will have the pulpit) to make the public case of the need for alternatives development (now) even though the price has subsided due to decreased demand. The price may have subsided but the supply remains a dwindling resource. Better we take the steps to make America independent of oil today and not try to do it when all hell has broken loose on multiple dangerous fronts of concern. I think the gas tax might be one way to insure we do not forget how much we hated five dollar a gallon gas. It would deal with the camp that is squawking about deficit spending and how we can pay for a revolutionary infrastructure project as economic stimulus. I also think we should legalize marijuana and tax it to realize a another revenue stream; one which I think the government is already complicit in. I also think that more can be done with prison labor concerning public works projects, manifesting rehabilitation through skills acquisition all while minimizing labor cost. The entire society needs to be redesigned, rethought, and revitalized. I do not know if such visionary and courageous thinking exists in Washington. Vision and courage are needed now more than ever. The same old thing is no longer acceptable as an answer for the challenges we collectively face.
Please, GrainOSand, just stick to energy. The longer your list gets the more people are going to demand a pony too. Let's do the doable first, then let's talk about my pony later, OK :-)
Unfortunately, that is the impression I left you with, I am sorry. Think on this -- all is one, or all is connected. Everything I mentioned is related to energy if you are looking outside of a box of indoctrination in terms of solutions. I never left the subject of energy in talking about ways to retrofit the infrastructure to accommodate a societal shift that would be oil independence. That shift is the infrastructure project Mr. Obama is talking about and it is the deficit spending to which the GOP is referring. I was "trying" to speak to both aspects of the issue -- the need to do it (the project), and the need to pay for it (new revenue streams and labor pools). Labor costs are some of the highest costs concerning running an enterprise. We have people in prison who are there for victimless crimes that need a path to rejoining society. A program of sweat equity is one such approach. The tax on gas and legalized marijuana, again, is meant to address the dreaded deficit spending required for a massive infrastructure project focusing on renewal, which includes a new energy grid. Efficiency is killing multiple birds with a single stone, or efficiency is a submachine gun not a one shot musket.
We need to get off fossil fuels period. Whether oil is $40 a barrel or $120. There's only a finite supply and one day it's going away. In the meantime, it's poisoning the planet. Oil producing countries will have to find another way to generate revenue. Oil is blood money.
I havent been convinced that the drop in oil prices is all from demand. The price of oil dropped before demand dropped when the economic crisis was in its very early stages. In fact, I remember reading that oil demand in the US dropped over a 3 month period last spring when the price was still shooting up. I'm sure there was a lot of money in oil futures that was pulled out either in anticipation of oil price drops or just in anticipation of the need of cash with the looming economic crisis. Think of Enron when considering how much money could be in oil futures (and how much money could be lost by delayed exit from the market). The price of oil before the 2006 election did not drop until George Bush out of the blue, and against all previous stated intentions, said he was going to to release oil from the US reserve. The price did not significantly go up after the election till George stated, again out of the blue, that he was going to double the size of the US reserves. The US reserves would not significantly affect supply and demand but it could significantly affect certainty in the market, enough to cause a withdrawal. It certainly would be a safer bet for big money to be in the very opaque oil futures market if they had connections in the White House and had advanced warning on issues that could affect the market..
"The main reason? In good times and bad, oil will continue to supply the largest share of the world's energy supply. For all the talk of alternatives, petroleum will remain the number one source of energy for at least the next several decades."
FALSE.
It's up to us.
Solar and wind with Hybrid vehicles can replace 90% of oil, and all coal and nukes in far less than 10 years.