Green Car News This Week
Ford finally figured out which way the wind is blowing and has decided to invest $75 million to retool its Michigan truck plant so that it can produce small, fuel-efficient cars.
Ford finally figured out which way the wind is blowing and has decided to invest $75 million to retool its Michigan truck plant so that it can produce small, fuel-efficient cars.
Sometimes, it's the incongruities, not the new models, which make the auto industry so interesting.
It's the same story we've been hearing from car-makers, especially those in Detroit, for the past 30 years: "Just wait a little longer and we'll have those new cars and trucks you've been hoping for."
Last week a mix of water and sanitation experts gathered for World Water Week in Stockholm, Sweden to mull over the world's biggest public health crisis. The problem is that not enough people paid attention.
It seems like the next generation of green(er) cars will be with us soon. A slew of announcements for plug-in hybrids and electric car all show the same time stamp: 2010. Here's what's coming up.
What are the odds that the only two hydrogen fuel cell cars in the city would be parked directly necxt to each other? And why is this so rare?
So, who really killed the electric car? Sadly, I think I did. Here's why: Rick Wagoner was interviewed the other day and said - "The future of GM and...
We moms find ourselves racing out of meetings, tearing off our tennis outfits, throwing down the great American novel we were writing. Mom is gone. In her place: The Chauffeur.
Ever wondered about that dreary film which builds-up inside the windshield of your car or truck? Not outside, which can be taken care of easily enough; inside.
Now, after several years of competition between XM and Sirius, there will be one satellite radio company -- a monopoly created by the federal government. And you don't need me to tell you how strange that is.
Whoever wins the upcoming election will apparently ride to the White House in a brand-new whip, with rear-wheel (or even all-wheel) drive and a marine-cooled diesel engine.
The sad truth is that technically, all the city has to do is post one sign, a single, solitary sign, to signify the particular parking restriction for the entire block.
Many in the environmental community are annoyed by Barack Obama's change of position on offshore drilling, even while they applaud his comprehensive energy plan.
GM is promoting the non-existent Chevrolet Volt, telling Olympics viewers it will be manufactured in 2010, but that's not definite. They say its gasoline powers a "generator" which keeps on-board batteries juiced-up.
When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging, and Ford seems to be doing that by slashing SUV production and re-tooling some factories for small car production. But will it be fast enough?
That the Detroit Three have to build cars and trucks which make sense now and in the future, and which Americans want to buy.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
I'm just Joe Blow like a lot of folks out there and I knew we were getting hosed with our cars getting bigger engines,then colossal size vehicles(Hummers) with huge rebates courtesy of this administration.I truly believe there were only two kinds of people,those like me,and those that don't give $h1# about anyone but themselves.GM is the latter,they know more about what was needed here than anyone on the planet.I'd like to say screw them but there are still Americans with jobs there and something needs to be done to re-organize GM and look out for hard working Americans,not CEO's that just pick up huge payouts for having the "right" contacts and golf partners.
short GM, Make a lot of money, live happily ever after
What if we let the consumer decide? If the consumer wants to pay for safety like air bags and so forth, then let them pay extra. If the consumer wants high gas mileage then let them choose gas mileage at the expense of safety. A free market will develop a wide spectrum for things like safety, performance, comfort, economy, size, and style. Most cars in a free market will strike a balance between many different desirable features.
Freedom of choice is what we want. That's what you guys on the Left want, right?
No you on the left are what we call elitist. You know what is better for me. Right down to the very particulars involving the mechanical workings of the car I can buy.
So you on the Left; tell me what car can I buy? Or shall the state provide for my transportation? On the bus this prole goes.
In the interest of a "free market" economy, I propose that anyone with a net worth of over $5 million be allowed to buy a car without safety equipment.
GM Volt to go on sale Novermber 2010. That's 38 months from now if I am not mistaken.
50 bucks that GM won't make it any longer than 30 months.
Toyota makes the numbers, why can't GM?
The question is, "Is GM just playing a game of smoke and mirrors making people think they are trying to meet fuel economy numbers while just setting on their hands waiting for gas prices to creep down to where people will start buying the gas guzzlers again."
While cars are slightly more efficient now, the gains have been minimal because of safety equipment. in the early 90's, one could buy a Geo (General Motors) Metro that gets 45-50 MPG without the expense and environmental damage of batteries. They don't make it today for two reasons: Not enough people bought them. Safety standards progressed to the point that the car would hae been made too heavy, lowering the gas mileage. The average car gets about 25-30 MPG these days. My 1991 Honda Accord gets 28-30 MPG while having 228,000 miles on it and being 18 years old. There has been much progress in automobiles, but due to the increased safety standards forcing the cars to be heavier, the cars have more horsepower rather than getting better gas mileage.
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in