Now What?
Sarah Palin: if the stars misalign and you remain a national figure, it would be helpful for you to have at least a cursory understanding of the Constitution and political and economic issues.
Sarah Palin: if the stars misalign and you remain a national figure, it would be helpful for you to have at least a cursory understanding of the Constitution and political and economic issues.
The new online digital magazine (RED)WIRE will sponsor a series of unique performances by artists such as U2 and Sheryl Crow, in its bid to help fight AIDS.
Keith Olbermann has the temerity to ask if it's too late to sell Alaska back to the Russians -- repeatedly. America's liberal boy-wonder is breaking up with me.
How do I Thank Thee, Sarah Palin? Let me count the ways... (With profound apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning)
Wednesday, March 19, 2008: Martha Raddatz, ABC's Good Morning America: Two-thirds of Americans say [the Iraq War is] not worth fighting. Vice Pre...
Coulter's job is to inject into the Republican echo chamber racist words that would be unacceptable anywhere else, and she's now given away the far Right's anti-Obama strategy.
Last week a mix of water and sanitation experts gathered for World Water Week in Stockholm, Sweden to mull over the world's biggest public health crisis. The problem is that not enough people paid attention.
It looks like MSNBC caved into McCain's complaints, which will anger liberals. David Gregory? FOX news didn't get to be the number-one cable news network by being dull and balanced.
If an undecided voter responded strongly to the yelling from Mitt, Rudy and Palin, and then watched McCain, they were probably disappointed and let-down by McCain.
In show business, Bill O'Reilly on Fox News Channel excoriates not only his time-slot rival Keith Olbermann, but the execs of NBC. In truth, the two networks have been virtual lovers for more than a year.
If I were to walk the mile from where I live to the studio and take the reins, I would at least threaten to cut out the tongue of any TV host who dares interrupt anyone else.
Of all the presidential contenders lined up on the stage in last year's AFL-CIO Chicago debate, Biden was the only one who had voted for the 2005 bill.
Just off their mostly news-free coverage of the 2008 presidential campaign, the major news networks have directed their correspondents to refrain from traditional news and stick to glitz.
O'Reilly raised an important topic. Too bad he got the facts wrong. Veterans represent one-third of the adult homeless population in this country, and that number is rising.
This frat boy, anti-Clinton wingnut-channeling tirade targeting Chelsea Clinton has proven that Shuster's not up to the job or the position to which MSNBC has bestowed on him.
I think my favorite benchmark of our post-racial society will be the birth of our post-racial champions on race. Add to the top of the list Keith Olbermann.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
How is allowing gay marriage hurting anyone? It depends on your perception of homosexuality. If you are a reasonably compassionate person, you either view it as a healthy expression of human sexuality, or you view it as sexual brokenness in need of healing. Neither perception is hateful nor condemning towards homosexuals. Simply put, if you believe homosexuality is healthy, there is nothing to heal and the law should honor your union. However, if you believe it is a form of sexual brokenness, it is harmful for the law to honor it because that promotes the falsehood that there is nothing to heal, preventing those in need of healing from seeking or receiving it.
Some who don't think of homosexuality as completely healthy don't want to pass "judgment" on someone else's sexual preference. Why? "That's their own personal choice, they aren't hurting anyone, and who am I to judge? Everyone should just love and accept each other..." This reasoning implies the only ways to love and accept homosexuals is to agree their lifestyle is healthy and best for them, or to avoid caring about that part of them altogether. I believe that acceptance, love, and compassion can happen without having to believe that lifestyle is the healthiest one for them -- even if they disagree. Discerning a lifestyle as unhealthy does not equate to hatred and condemnation, and I feel taking the passive approach of "not judging" is actually more apathetic than compassionate -- it's their life, why should I care?