This article exists as part of the online archive for HuffPost Australia, which closed in 2021.

The Turnbull Government Can't Stop Blaming Renewables

All politicians are being pleaded with to take politics out of energy security.
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull speaks with Minister for Environment and Energy Josh Frydenberg during Question Time.
Alex Ellinghausen/Fairfax
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull speaks with Minister for Environment and Energy Josh Frydenberg during Question Time.

CANBERRA – A weekend of scorching record temperatures, horrendous fire conditions and rolling power blackouts across Australia's south-east has focused minds -- and sweaty bodies -- on energy security.

It's a subject the Turnbull Government wants to talk about in 2017 as it pushes back an increasingly confident Labor Opposition and the Greens on their "mindless" renewable energy policies.

But now the Prime Minister and senior ministers have been accused of over-egging it ever since the unprecedented and catastrophic state-wide blackout across South Australia last September.

Fairfax Media is reporting, through a freedom of information release obtained by the Australia Institute, that Turnbull and ministers were quickly advised by the Australian Energy Market Operator that wind, in particular the state's high renewable energy target, was not to blame for the blackout.

"There has been unprecedented damage to the network (ie bigger than any other event in Australia), with 20+ steel transmission towers down in the north of the State due to wind damage (between Adelaide and Port Augusta). The electricity network was unable to cope with such a sudden and large loss of generation at once. AEMOs advice is that the generation mix (ie renewable or fossil fuel) was not to blame for yesterday's events – it was the loss of 1000 MW of power in such a short space of time as transmission lines fell over."

Australian Energy MarketOperator

To sum up, public service experts advised the Government within 24 hours that the blackout was caused by transmission lines being knocked out by once in 50-year storms.

"The generation mix (ie renewable or fossil fuel) was not to blame," AEMO advised.

This advice was ignored, as the Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce, Energy and Environment Minister Josh Frydenberg and Prime Minister attacked the state Labor government's "unrealistic" energy policies.

"With the strong reliance on wind power, there is an exceptional draw that's then put on the network from other sources when that wind power is unable to be generated," Joyce told ABC Radio.

Now before we go any further, a motley crew of electricity suppliers, business groups and environmentalists, including the Australian Aluminium Council, the Australian Conservation Foundation and the Australian Council of Social Services (ACOSS) has been brought together to tell all politicians to end "partisan antics" on energy security and get on with it.

"There is simply no room for partisan politics when the reliability, affordability and sustainability of Australia's energy system is at stake," the joint letter reads.

But the Turnbull Government is standing firm.

The story containing the advice, released via FOI, is a "beat up" according to the Education Minister Simon Birmingham and a "sensationalist, false story," according to backbencher Tim Wilson.

.@Birmo: the energy problem in South Australia has presented itself as a long-term pattern that needs to be fixed

— Sky News Australia (@SkyNewsAust) February 12, 2017

And the minister responsible for energy security, Josh Frydenberg, is not changing tack.

"What made South Australia so vulnerable was it's heavy reliance on intermittent sources of power, particularly wind, but also solar," Frydenberg told Sky News.

The Minister is not disputing the advice from AEMO, reading it as "totally consistent" with government arguments that the blackout was precipitated by a weather event, but the state had to deal with "unreliable" sources of power.

"Without the heavy reliance on renewables, the South Australian system would not have been as vulnerable as it was."

The Prime Minister dialled back the renewables attack on Monday, but referred to windmills rather than wind turbines.

He claims he's been misrepresented.

"Let me be very clear, of course windmills did not cause a blackout," Turnbull told reporters in Canberra. "The blackout, as I have said many times, was caused by a storm breaching transmission lines.

"That is perfectly obvious. That is the only point that was made."

"However, the introduction of a massive amount of wind energy, so variable renewable energy, made the South Australian grid very vulnerable. Very, very vulnerable, indeed, to breaches in transmission lines and the overloading or pressure on the interconnector with Victoria."

Last September, Turnbull described the blackout as a "wake-up call" to focus on energy security and said there was "no doubt" that the "extremely aggressive" shift to renewables had strained the electricity network.

"I regret to say that a number of the state Labor governments have over the years set priorities and renewable targets that are extremely aggressive, extremely unrealistic, and have paid little or no attention to energy security," Turnbull told reporters in Launceston.

Labor has accused Turnbull of "alternative facts".

"It is clear from today's revelations that the Prime Minister made a deliberate decision to ignore that advice and lie to the Australian people about the cause of this very serious event," Labor's Mark Butler told reporters in Canberra.

"Not only did he lie to the nation, he lied to the nation during an emergency."

"Malcolm Turnbull needs to come clean. He needs to admit to the Australian people that he has been playing politics with a very serious energy crisis that is enveloping the country."


Suggest a correction
This article exists as part of the online archive for HuffPost Australia. Certain site features have been disabled. If you have questions or concerns, please check our FAQ or contact