Put the Department of Finance on the growing list of observers who are questioning the accuracy of Canada’s unemployment numbers.
According to documents obtained by the Globe and Mail, the department has concluded that volatility in Canada’s jobs data is “well above” normal.
“The volatility of employment growth as measured by the [Labour Force Survey] has increased over the course of 2012 and 2013 and remains well above its 1977-to-date average,” says a briefing note prepared for Finance Minister Jim Flaherty.
The note seems to contradict Statistics Canada’s own assertions that there has been no increase in the ups and downs seen in Canada’s monthly job numbers.
StatsCan's two employment surveys measure jobs by different means and can often show differing results, but many economists and analysts have been particularly taken by surprise by some of Canada’s job reports in recent months.
StatsCan’s labour force survey for November, 2013, found the country added 21,000 jobs that month, but the later survey of payroll earnings and hours found Canada lost 27,600 jobs the same month.
Story continues below
In one glaring example, Statscan initially reported that Canada lost 39,000 jobs in July of last year, but the later survey found Canada had created 60,000 jobs that month.
And one economist described the August, 2013, unemployment report as “impossible” because most of that month’s 59,000 new jobs appeared to have been created in one city — Toronto.
But Statscan says there is nothing statistically unusual about recent job numbers.
“When we look at the data, there is no indication of increased volatility relative to what we have seen in the past. It is only perception,” labour force survey manager Christel Le Petit said in a blog posting last fall.
She told the Globe that unemployment numbers can seem more volatile when job growth is flat; the numbers tend to swing from positive to negative more often when this is the case.
And Canada’s job market has indeed been flat, if Statscan’s numbers are correct: The country added a paltry 0.8 per cent more jobs in 2013, about a third of the rate seen the year before.
Le Petit also said the Department of Finance was “comparing apples to oranges” by looking at the long-term data and concluding the recent data is more volatile. That’s because older numbers have been revised, ironing out some of the inconsistencies, she said, while newer numbers haven’t been revised.
She said budget cuts at Statistics Canada had no impact on the numbers.