9 Giant Banks Make a Deal on Blockchain: What It Means

A blockchain is public ledger of transactions that is distributed among all participants in a market or system. Each transaction that happens within a market or system must be verified by a strong majority of participants. It's very difficult to falsify transactions in a blockchain because each transaction generates a strong cryptographic signature.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

When Goldman Sachs talks, people all over the world listen. Today Goldman is talking about the blockchain. What the heck is the "blockchain"? Only the next biggest thing since the Internet, according to such tech visionaries such as noted venture capitalist Marc Andreessen.

For most of those outside of Silicon Valley and other tech centers, the blockchain is some mysterious computer thing that works with Bitcoin. What they may fail to realize is that the blockchain could completely change the world by allowing us to finally establish true trust and accountability online.

We got a glimpse of the blockchain future when nine of the world's largest banks, including Goldman Sachs and Barclays, announced that they would create a Blockchain system to use for establishing trust and managing transactions in global financial markets.

A blockchain is public ledger of transactions that is distributed among all participants in a market or system. Each transaction that happens within a market or system must be verified by a strong majority of participants. It's very difficult to falsify transactions in a blockchain because each transaction generates a strong cryptographic signature. Once a transaction is entered in the public ledger, it cannot be erased. Because every transaction is public record and known to everyone in the blockchain, it's nearly impossible to hide untoward activities.

What this means is that complete strangers can transact business without ever meeting each other or really trusting each other. The other part of blockchain, which is equally intriguing, is that it allows for very rapid settling of transactions. With stock trades, for example, today it takes nearly a week for most trades to officially "clear." With a blockchain infrastructure, a trade could clear as fast as the bits cross the wires.

There's more. Financial applications are only one of the possible use cases. Blockchain is much bigger than finance. Medical records and voting records could be secured and verified by blockchain. Small businesses could use blockchain to create trusted trading platforms among themselves. There are a number of high-profile startups, such as Ethereum, trying to make toolkits that would allow anyone to build their own blockchain-based applications and markets without having to build the complicated and technologically taxing guts of the blockchain.

According to venture capitalist and blockchain expert William Mougayar who has built a database of blockchain startups, there are nearly 500 blockchain-based startups across more than four dozen sub-categories including media, health, education and, of course, many flavors of finance. (Below is a list of those startups, grouped by sub-category).

Data from crypto.silk.co

Because participants in a blockchain can be both trusted and anonymous, it's also an amazingly powerful way to circumvent censorship and promote the free flow of information. Because the blockchain operates on consensus rather than central authority, the middle man is no longer required to verify and vet transactions.

So if every shareholder of NYSE stocks got together on the same blockchain, there would be no need to route them through fancy banks of computers, checks and balances that the exchange runs to handle transaction volume and secure the market. If we establish a national blockchain system for medical records, then Medicare fraud would be easier to detect and see (it also would mean fraudsters would be more difficult to identify). More radically, blockchain could replace central banks. More likely, blockchain will be adopted by central banks and cryptographically secured currencies will become widely used.

The importance of a big imprimatur like the one blockchain received today is hard to exaggerate. The big banks are the ones with the most to lose from something like a blockchain. They are the ultimate middlemen building businesses on their position as arbiters of trade. On the other hand, those same banks recognize that the blockchain holds amazing promise to open up entirely new lines of business for them.

And rather than let a bunch of startups take control of the blockchain universe, the banks wanted to build their own blockchain structures to keep it in the family. Which isn't bad in the least. Like the Internet, the blockchain is a neutral structure that can be used for good or evil but holds potential to revolutionize everything. Make no mistake. It is the future. That's why Goldman and the other big banks are throwing their lot in with the Bitcoiners of the world and betting big on the blockchain to finally bring inescapable order to the burgeoning online universe.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot