Arts Advocacy Day 2017 : Not Just Another Day

Wow, another Arts Advocacy Day (March 20-21) is upon us. But this one is like no other.

If we are to believe the press (and a few of us still do), the Washington Post among others have reported that under President Trump’s proposed budget “The Corporation for Public Broadcasting would be privatized” ... “while the National Endowment for the Arts and National Endowment for the Humanities would be eliminated entirely.”

Is it too early to get excited about this? I think not.

The arts and arts integration are not only vital to any and everything that make a democracy work, we are now finding that these things are what will really make America great because they are crucial to a well-rounded education, to whole-brain thinking, to STEM learning.

The argument I would put forth to artists and art organizations alike — who most likely will be calling on local, regional politicians and Congress during Arts Advocacy day— is the role that art can and must play in the everyday life of every human being, in our schools, and our community as never before. This has become an economic, as well as a social, imperative.

Given the outsourcing of jobs and off shoring of whole businesses — all consequences of globalization of course — there is an urgent need to define this age we’re in, and to advocate for recognition and meaningful change in attitudes that the arts are not only nice but necessary to the wealth and well-being of our nation.

If we fail to alert America to this looming crisis, we will only see a continued downward spiral of our economy, our young people will not find the work they want and need, the purchasing power of the average family will dwindle, and the state of America’s prowess in both the economic and political arena will be lost.

Daniel Bell, author and Harvard sociologist, in a book called The Coming Post Industrial Society first published in 1973 looked backward in time and noted how the invention of the cotton gin by Eli Whitney transformed the farm, forced people into the cities and created what we now call the Industrial Revolution.

He could see that computers and telecommunications like the cotton gin of an earlier era were bringing about yet another shift in the global economy, which he called the Post Industrial Society. Bell’s treatise was the first literary effort that identified structural changes in society leading to the Information Age.

Now, 50 or so years later, we are struggling to define yet another shift in the basic structure of the world’s economy. We know it’s global, and Thomas Friedman of the New York Times has told us, it’s “flat.” But it is creativity — simply defined as “the quality or ability to create or invent something” — that best defines the quality most of us need to succeed in the new economy. And it is art that best leads us to creativity and in turn, innovation.

But again, it is not as important what we call this new age. Call it The Creative Age as Business Week once did or The Age of Innovation, which Business Week later did thinking that might appeal more to the business reader, or call it The Age of Creativity and Innovation and make everyone happy.

What is important is that we recognize that a whole new economy and society based upon creativity and innovation is emerging and that, as a consequence, we recognize the vital importance of reinventing our communities, our schools, our businesses, and our government to meet the challenges such major shifts in the structure of the world economy.

More and more we are beginning to see that “arts-training is crucial to developing creativity.” Creativity leads to innovation, and innovation is America’s only path to prosperity and, certainly, survival.

testPromoTitleReplace testPromoDekReplace Join HuffPost Today! No thanks.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.