Twitter Responds To NYT Mag Inquiry: Would You Kill Baby Hitler?

We asked @nytmag readers: If you could go back and kill Hitler as a baby, would you do it? (What's your response?) pic.twitter.com/daatm12NZC

— NYT Magazine (@NYTmag) October 23, 2015

.@NYTmag y'all ok?

— starryknight (@sharisknight) October 23, 2015

@NYTmag if you were a hotline, would you bling?

— Margarita Noriega (@margarita) October 23, 2015

@NYTmag pic.twitter.com/4oVbGIHQfM

— steve boousseau (@steverousseau) October 23, 2015

@TimHerrera @NYTmag if you were a hot dog would you eat yourself

— Steve Kovach (@stevekovach) October 23, 2015

@NYTmag If your ex Adele called, would you answer?

— Kevin O'Leary (@kevincarroleary) October 23, 2015

Nobody puts baby Hitler in the corner.

— Sam Adams — boo! (@SamuelAAdams) October 23, 2015

.@NYTmag I would take Baby Hitler and raise him as my own, putting his powers to use for good instead of evil.

— hambulatory skeledad (@JimmyBrangus) October 23, 2015

How many babies am I allowed as collateral damage here, @NYTmag? Can I use another baby as a weapon?

— James Erwin (@jlerwin) October 23, 2015

"If you could go back in time would you kill a baby--" "Yes." "...Hitler." "Right yeah. I knew you were going to say that."

— Josh Gondelman (@joshgondelman) October 23, 2015

What if Instead of killing Baby Hitler You rewrote the Treaty of Versailles Using the time machine you have Just a suggestion

— Hayes Brown (@HayesBrown) October 23, 2015

None of us get time machines because we’d shoot an innocent kid instead of teaching him to paint.

— Karan Lyons (@karanlyons) November 13, 2014

lol

— NYT Magazine (@NYTmag) October 23, 2015