The BBC’s coverage of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial – which ended with a guilty verdict Wednesday – backfired when the broadcasters attempted to analyze the result shortly afterwards with Alan Dershowitz.
Maxwell, a close associate of the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, was found guilty on five charges related to sex trafficking and the grooming of girls and young women.
She could face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
Lawyer Alan Dershowitz represented Epstein in the past and has been accused of sexual abuse by Virginia Giuffre, a woman who claims she was trafficked by Maxwell and Epstein too.
Despite this clear link to the pair, the BBC chose to interview Dershowitz after Maxwell’s verdict came through.
He was introduced only as a “constitutional lawyer,” triggering significant outrage among viewers.
The BBC then released a statement Thursday which read: “The interview with Alan Dershowitz after the Ghislaine Maxwell verdict did not meet the BBC’s editorial standards, as Mr Dershowitz was not a suitable person to interview as an impartial analyst, and we did not make the relevant background clear to our audience.
“We will look into how this happened.”
Dershowitz was discussing the implications of the verdict on Prince Andrew’s upcoming civil case, brought by Giuffre.
He said: “The most important thing for British viewers is that the government was very careful who it used as witnesses.
“It did not use as a witness the woman who accused Prince Andrew, who accused me, who accused many other people, because the government didn’t believe she was telling the truth.”
Dershowitz then said the case did “nothing to strengthen the case against Prince Andrew,” and claimed the U.S. government only used “witnesses who they believed were credible” and who the jury would believe.
Lawyers tweeted about the decision to interview Dershowitz minutes after Maxwell’s verdict came through, with barrister Adam Wagner describing it as a “huge error by the BBC.”
Caoilfhionn Gallagher QC also tweeted: “Shocked. Utterly bizarre decision and does the audience a disservice.”
She added: “It’s the choice to interview him, but more importantly, 1) not contextulaising in any way: no mention of Dershowitz having acted for Epstein, or that Virginia Giuffre accused him of abuse, or the defamation suits, and giving him a platform to undermine Giuffre, unchallenged. Appalling.”
Lawyers weren’t the only ones baffled by the BBC’s decision.
