Last week the "trillion dollar platinum coin" entered the public lexicon as part of Washington's debt ceiling debate. It sounds jaunty and paradoxical, but it is a surprisingly serious proposal.
The coin presents a rare opportunity to have a public discussion about the nature of money, something very few people understand. If advocates play their cards (and coins) right, it could even result in the creation of a new and more sustainable monetary system.
Before diving in, let's get the obligatory jokes out of the way:
Have you heard about the trillion dollar platinum coin? Obama calls it "change he can believe in."
Pres Obama: "When I said there would be no negotiation on the debt ceiling, well I mint it."
The coin could feature a picture of a pyramid with an eyeball on top saying "What debt ceiling? I don't see it" and the slogan "E Pluribus Unum Trillion."
OK, so here's a summary of the trillion dollar coin proposal: The Federal government has a self-imposed debt ceiling that must be raised by Congress periodically in order to continue to pay its bills. If House Republicans refuse to raise the debt ceiling, a legal loophole allows the U.S. Treasury to mint a high value (trillion dollar) coin, and deposit it at the Federal Reserve, where the Treasury's account would be credited, this allowing government borrowing to continue. In the narrowest strategic reading, the coin could buy the president time to reach an agreement with Congress on the debt ceiling. Similarly, the president could threaten to use the coin unless Congress gives the president the authority to unilaterally raise the debt ceiling. In return, Congress could revoke the ability to mint future trillion dollar coins. In these scenarios, the status quo is preserved, and no major changes are implied to the existing monetary system.
Between jokes, blogs have assessed the coin's legality and constitutionality , and the coin seems to pass both tests. But the coin idea raises bigger -- some might say "richer" -- issues and even suggests some solutions.
First, in the short term, the coin calls into question the austerity-driven politics that has been adopted by both Republicans such as Paul Ryan and Democrats including Presidents Clinton and Obama. Incorrectly comparing the federal budget to a business or family budget, they imply that the government has no money, needs to borrow it (from the big banks and China), and leaves a legacy of debt shouldered by future generations. This is all refuted by the coin. The coin's message is that actually the U.S. is a sovereign nation, the government can print its own currency unlike a household or small business, and the national debt can be solved with a few benign changes to the monetary system.
Critics of the trillion dollar coin are often using gold-standard thinking in a fiat currency world. Banking interests and conservative "deficit hawks" want to scare Americans into rolling back entitlement programs, focus the tax burden on the lower classes, and preserve the banking industry's profits. The coin has other ideas. It is telling us that we can afford government programs, whether it is Social Security, rebuilding crumbling infrastructure, or protecting the population from climate change. The coin offers the choice of stimulus over austerity.
Second, the coin illustrates the distinction between debt-backed versus debt-free money, and interest-accumulating versus interest-free money, for both federal budgeting and the entire economy. In 1913, the U.S. government outsourced the money creation power to the Federal Reserve, which is comprised of a cartel of banks. Federal Reserve Notes are created through bank loans and accumulate compound interest that must be paid back over time to the lending banks. Those interest payments mean that everyone, including the Federal Government, pays rent on money created by the Federal Reserve System. Unlike the Federal Reserve Notes, the trillion dollar coin is debt-free and interest-free. The government has disempowered itself of the benefits of "seignorage," but the coin offers to reinstate that power.
Third, the coin provides an entry point for broad and important discussions about monetary reform. Such discussions could even prompt Congress and the president to begin work on a monetary reform bill in 2013, following a template supported by the American Monetary Institute. Such a bill could:
- Change the way the Federal Reserve handles U.S. Treasury securities. For example, in the course of its regular monetary functions, the Fed could retire U.S. Treasury securities instead of letting interest on the debt accumulate.
Finally, once the trillion dollar coin's work is done in the debt ceiling debate, it could be "spent" into circulation as a "citizen's dividend," as the first installment of the people's new seignorage royalties from the money commons. At 311 million Americans, that would be about $3,200 per person. Obviously, the new-found power of money creation has its limits, and safeguards should be built in to prevent inflationary spending once the current debt deflation subsides.
Two contenders for the face of the coin are President Andrew Jackson and President Abraham Lincoln. Jackson was the only president to have retired all U.S. debt. Lincoln would be appropriate because he issued a debt-free fiat currency, Greenbacks, to finance the Civil War. Lincoln has a public relations edge over Jackson, with his Steven Spielberg movie on track to win Best Picture this year, and he has a backup plan as well, in case Treasury Secretary Geithner decides to ship 100 trillion pennies over to the Fed instead.