Mayor Michael Bloomberg responded to a judge's decision Monday to strike down the city's restrictions on large, sugary beverages.
He expressed confidence that the judge's ruling will be overturned on appeal.
Bloomberg's soda ban initiative was set to take effect on Tuesday.
Health Commissioner Dr. Thomas Farley said they will prove in a court of appeals that the city's board of health did not overreach in its powers when it passed the soda initiative.
"There's one public health crisis that has grown worse and worse over the years and that's obesity," Mayor Bloomberg stressed, after reciting a long list of public health initiatives his administration has passed.
During his three terms as mayor, Bloomberg introduced a ban on trans fats, a ban on smoking in some public places, and required restaurants to post letter grades.
"5,000 people in New York City will die this year of obesity," he said. "It would be irresponsible for us not to do everything we can to save lives."
Mayor Bloomberg had previously expressed confidence that the measure would survive in court.
"Everytime you do something groundbreaking, special interests will sue," he explained Tuesday. "That's America."
"We're very confident we'll win on appeal," he added.
Previously, from the Associated Press:
NEW YORK — A judge struck down New York City's groundbreaking limit on the size of sugar-laden drinks Monday shortly before it was set to take effect, agreeing with the beverage industry and other opponents that the rule is arbitrary in applying to only some sweet beverages and some places that sell them. .
"The loopholes in this rule effectively defeat the stated purpose of this rule," Manhattan state Supreme Court Justice Milton Tingling wrote.
Further, the Board of Health went beyond its authority in approving the size limit, he said. The restriction was supposed to start Tuesday.
"The portion cap rule, if upheld, would create an administrative Leviathan and violate the separation of powers doctrine," by straying into territory that should belong to the elected City Council, not the board appointed by Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Tingling wrote.
That, he wrote, "has the potential to be more troubling than sweetened beverages.
The city Board of Health approved the measure in September. Championed by Bloomberg, it follows on other efforts his administration has made to improve New Yorkers' eating habits, from compelling chain restaurants to post calorie counts on their menus to barring artificial trans fats in restaurant food to prodding food manufacturers to use less salt.
The city has said that while restaurant inspectors would start enforcing the soda size rule in March, they wouldn't seek fines – $200 for a violation – until June.
Soda makers, restaurateurs, movie theater owners and other business groups sued, asking a judge to declare the measure invalid. In February, they asked Tingling to bar the city from enforcing the regulation while the suit played out.
City officials have called the size limit a pioneering move for public health. They point to the city's rising obesity rate – about 24 percent of adults, up from 18 percent in 2002 – and to studies tying sugary drinks to weight gain. Care for obesity-related illnesses costs government health programs about $2.8 billion a year in New York City alone, according to city Health Commissioner Dr. Thomas Farley.
The supersize-drink crackdown will "have significant public health effects, and the sooner that happens, the better," city lawyer Mark W. Muschenheim said in court in February.
Critics said the measure is too limited to make a meaningful impact on New Yorkers' waistlines. But they said it would take a bite out of business for the eateries that have to comply, while other establishments still will get sell sugary drinks in 2-liter bottles and supersize cups.
Beverage makers had expected to spend about $600,000 changing bottles and labels, movie theater owners feared losing soda sales that account for 20 percent of their profits, and delis and restaurants would have had to change inventory, reprint menus and make other adjustments, according to court papers.
"These are costs which these businesses are not going to be compensated for," and the money will be wasted if the court ultimately nixes the law, James E. Brandt, a lawyer for the American Beverage Association and other opponents, told the judge in February.
Critics also said the restriction should have gone before the elected City Council instead of the Bloomberg-appointed health board. The city says the panel of doctors and other health professionals had both the authority and expertise to make the decision.