Boeing, Democrats Kill Anti-Drone Bill In Washington State

Boeing, Democrats Kill Anti-Drone Bill
SIERRA VISTA, AZ - MARCH 07: Maintenence personel check a Predator drone operated by U.S. Office of Air and Marine (OAM), before its surveillance flight near the Mexican border on March 7, 2013 from Fort Huachuca in Sierra Vista, Arizona. The OAM, which is part of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, flies the unmanned - and unarmed - MQ-9 Predator B aircraft an average of 12 hours per day at around 19,000 feet over southern Arizona. The drones, piloted from the ground, search for drug smugglers and immigrants crossing illegally from Mexico into the United States. Due to federal sequestration cuts, Customs and Border Protection is expected to lose $500 million from its budget, and OAM staff at Ft. Huachuca are now taking unpaid furlough days once every two weeks. (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)
SIERRA VISTA, AZ - MARCH 07: Maintenence personel check a Predator drone operated by U.S. Office of Air and Marine (OAM), before its surveillance flight near the Mexican border on March 7, 2013 from Fort Huachuca in Sierra Vista, Arizona. The OAM, which is part of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, flies the unmanned - and unarmed - MQ-9 Predator B aircraft an average of 12 hours per day at around 19,000 feet over southern Arizona. The drones, piloted from the ground, search for drug smugglers and immigrants crossing illegally from Mexico into the United States. Due to federal sequestration cuts, Customs and Border Protection is expected to lose $500 million from its budget, and OAM staff at Ft. Huachuca are now taking unpaid furlough days once every two weeks. (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)

A bill that would have restricted domestic drones died in the Washington state Legislature on Wednesday, the victim of intense lobbying from unmanned-aircraft manufacturer Boeing, its sponsor said. The death of the anti-drone bill at the hands of the state's House Democratic majority was another sign of how drones have upended traditional left-right thinking about issues like privacy and human rights.

Republican state Rep. David Taylor's legislation would have forced Washington's state and local law enforcement agencies, as well as its regulatory agencies, to obtain legislative approval before buying drones. It was inspired in part by the Seattle Police Department's recent bungled attempt to buy drones.

The bill passed out of committee in February on a bipartisan 9-1 vote. When the Washington House's Democratic leadership began to consider whether to bring it up for a full floor vote, however, the trouble began.

Both Boeing, which employed 83,000 people in Washington state in 2012, and the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs pushed back. Boeing was concerned about the potential blow to the domestic drone market, and the police officials were worried about having their drone purchases put under the public eye.

"Boeing was inflexible," Taylor said. "I believe that Boeing got to the Democrat leadership, and that's why the bill didn't move."

The legislation technically failed because it failed to get a floor vote before a 5 p.m. Wednesday cutoff. The House Democratic Caucus did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Taylor introduced the bill after the Washington State Farm Bureau raised concerns that regulators would use drones to spy on farmland. His bill was supported by the state branch of the American Civil Liberties Union, which was worried that drones might be used for warrantless surveillance.

Sue Bradley, the director of communications for Boeing's community and government relations department, told HuffPost via email that "Boeing had concerns about the bill and could not support it in the form it was presented."

Responding to the ACLU's lobbying on the issue, she wrote, "All I will say is that every legislative session we support policies that advance the company’s business interests and keep the state competitive."

Taylor said he will try for a full House vote again next year. He said he has tried to remain open to Boeing and to address its concerns, to no avail.

"It was just a fundamental disagreement," Taylor said. "The best way to put it, quite frankly, is profits over people's privacy. That's really what the disagreement came down to."

Before You Go

Boeing Phantom Ray

Drones: The Future Of Flight

Popular in the Community