A low-level computer analyst, Edward Snowden, an employee of federal contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, successfully and launched a national conversation about government surveillance. He also exposed what happens when important government functions are outsourced to for-profit companies.
Not only did the federal government outsource surveillance, but they also outsourced the background checks of employees for granting security clearance. In both cases, federal offices didn't' have the staff to monitor and manage the contractors.
Cash-strapped mayors and governors are privatizing critical public services and assets to for-profit corporations that promise to taxpayer savings.
Unfortunately for taxpayers, not only has outsourcing these services and privatizing public infrastructure to for-profit companies failed to keep this promise, but too often it undermines transparency, and public accountability.
In fact, the fine print in these contracts often gives government contractors the power to make public decisions and guarantees profits even when it conflicts with public purpose. For example:
- A Morgan Stanley-backed consortium signed a 75-year lease with the city of Chicago for 36,000 public parking meters and a number of city-owned parking lots. Taxpayers are now obligated to reimburse the company when they want to close a street, and are prohibited from building “competing parking lots.
In Denver, the 99-year contract with the foreign consortium to operates the Northwest Parkway prevents public road improvements near their toll road because they "might hurt the parkway financially" by providing an alternative route for drivers. In 2012, for-profit prison company, Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), offered to buy public prisons from state across the country in exchange for a promise to keep the prisons 90 percent filled for 20 years. Governments would have to keep prison beds filled or for taxpayers to pay the prison even if crime rates drop and fewer beds are needed. Too often outsourcing public services has put further pressure on the middle class and the local economy as wages and benefits fall while corporate profits rise. For example,
food service workers in New Jersey public schools had their wages cut by $4 to $6 per hour. Most of the sub-contracted workers received few, if any, benefits leaving them uninsured or enrolled in state public health insurance programs.
Taxpayers across the country are making it known that they won't stand for having the public interest privatized. In places like Texas, New Jersey, and California, corporate efforts to undermine transparency, accountability, shared prosperity and competition are being thwarted by responsible legislators. In Fresno, voters this month rejected an effort backed by Mayor Ashley Swearengin to outsource trash service for the city's 500,000 residents to a private company (and cut pay for its workers),
Lawmakers are starting to make common sense contracting reform proposals such as requiring any company paid with tax dollars to open its books and meetings to the public (just as public agencies do), requiring companies that receive public contracts to pay a living wage with reasonable benefits, and banning language that promises profits even if public services are no longer needed.
Alderman Roderick Sawyer of Chicago's Sixth Ward has introduced the "Privatization Accountability and Transparency Ordinance to protect taxpayers from future parking contract disasters. "[The parking meter contract] was a bad deal and has tied the hands of taxpayers ever since," said Sawyer.
In New Jersey, legislation to ensure that public services won't be privatized unless it will result in actual savings for taxpayers has passed both chambers of the legislature and is waiting for a signature -- or veto -- by Governor Chris Christie.
Outsourcing without these kinds of common sense reforms threatens the public's ability to hold government accountable. In a recent statement, Katherine McFate, president of the Center for Effective Government, summed up the challenge to democracy: "You can't vote the president of the private water company out of office if the service is bad and the bills get outrageous."
Support HuffPost
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.
Would you join us to help keep our stories free for all? Your contribution of as little as $2 will go a long way.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you’ll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.