Cutting Conservation Cannot Fix the Deficit

Conservation spending did not cause the budget deficit and cutting conservation cannot fix the deficit. The Interior and Environment bill cuts too deeply into conservation programs.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

We at The Nature Conservancy have always worked with lawmakers to find constructive and cooperative solutions to keep natural resources across the country - and around the world -- healthy and productive.

But we oppose passage of the Interior and Environment Appropriations Bill now pending in the House of Representatives.

Conservation spending did not cause the budget deficit and cutting conservation cannot fix the deficit.

We understand this country faces a budget crisis and that all Federal programs, including conservation initiatives, should share a fair proportion of the spending reductions. We understand, as well, that the leadership of the Interior Appropriations Subcommittee faces daunting challenges in constructing a bill with very limited resources. And we recognize some positive elements of the bill such as support for fire restoration.

But this bill cuts far too deeply into funding for the kinds of cooperative, results-oriented conservation programs we know to be both popular and effective. It also includes policy language that undermines the ability of government to protect our nation's air, land and water.

The floods that ripped through the South this spring demonstrate why we should continue to invest in America's lands and waters for the benefit of our families, communities and economies.

When the Mississippi River threatened to overflow this spring and cause catastrophic damage to local communities in New Orleans and Baton Rouge, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers turned to the Atchafalaya Basin, a 1.3 million-acre floodplain forest in Louisiana whose marshes naturally absorb and store flood waters. By opening floodgates along the Mississippi River, the Corps of Engineers was able to divert waters into the basin and release pressure on levees that were ready to burst. Had the federal government not helped protect this land years ago, there would have been no where for those flood waters to go.

Our lands and waters are not luxuries. They provide vital services - shelter, food, clean water and income -- essential to the well-being of our nation.

As Theodore Roosevelt said a hundred years ago, "There can be no greater issue than conservation in this country".

This is truer today than ever before.

Our natural resources face growing threats as populations increase and create greater demand for food, fiber, energy and water. Expanding cities are displacing forests and grasslands that sustain water and air quality. Our changing climate - and the droughts and floods it brings -- threatens our farmlands, water supplies, fisheries and recreational areas.

These impacts can be managed so long as we invest in conservation of the resources that support our economy and our lives.

In the dark days of the Dust Bowl during the Great Depression, our country realized the importance of soil and water conservation to the nation's future. From that crisis were born federal programs to work in partnership with private landowners to ensure the longterm productivity of agriculture and forestry. Federal initiatives were launched to set aside and manage public forests, wildlife refuges and parks, and environmental advancements were made to protect the quality of our air and drinking water.

Environmental investment also protects us from natural hazards. Intact floodplains reduce damage from floods. Healthy forests can protect communities from fire while also providing water supplies for our cities. Oyster reefs and coastal marshes buffer the shore from storm damage. And as we've seen in recent months, the millions of dollars needed to manage healthy forests or protect wetlands is minimal compared to the billions needed to rebuild homes, businesses and lives impacted by fires and floods.

Of course achieving conservation is not free, but it is remarkably economical. All the conservation and environmental activities of the Federal government amount to only a little more than 1% of the Federal budget. In real dollars the total funding for the environment and conservation has been almost flat for 30 years.

Again, conservation spending did not cause the budget deficit and cutting conservation cannot fix the deficit.

Over the last century, in good times and bad, with broad bi-partisan support, this country has invested in the conservation of land and water, productive soils and wildlife habitat for the benefit of the American people. We have done so in the belief that, regardless of the other demands of society, each generation has a responsibility to pass on to the next natural resources that are healthy, clean, productive and beautiful. As Congress continues to debate funding for our nation's lands and waters, we hope and trust they will recognize this continuing obligation to our children.

Before You Go

Popular in the Community