I learned exclusively tonight that the Democratic Coalition Against Trump is being joined by University of Minnesota Law Professor Richard Painter in a non-partisan joint campaign to expedite a response to their parallel complaints against FBI Director James Comey.
Painter is a former Bush Administration White House Counsel who served as ethics counsel to the President.
“Richard Painter and I connected this evening, and we are sending out the message clearly that the FBI Director’s behavior is a non-partisan issue, and we will be sending out a joint press release tomorrow morning accordingly,” said Scott Dworkin, Senior Adivsor to the Democratic Coalition Against Trump.
The conservative Republican Penter and the Democratic opposition research group are joining forces for media appearances to restore non-partisan workings of the FBI.
Both parties seek a rapid and satisfactory precedent, which prevents future political interference by America’s top federal law enforcement agency into partisan elections.
“We plan to make joint television and other media appearances together with Professor Painter,” said Dworkin who plans to participate in the broadcasts, “or alongside other members of the DCAT.”
Each independently made similar complaints to Department of Justice’s Office of Special Counsel’s ruling about the FBI Director’s recent memo.
The memo has intruded on this year’s presidential election, which is why DCAT and Painter are alleging that FBI Director Comey’s memo to Congress violated the Hatch Act, which prohibits pernicious partisan use of office by federal employees or officials.
The FBI Director ignored Justice Department policy guidance which proscribes public investigatory actions within 60-days of an election.
It’s a policy implemented across parties and administrations for decades to keep justice and elections un-entwined.
Justice officials specifically advised Comey of the policy.
He sent a mea culpa letter to other FBI agents just hours after the election-impacting memo.
The Democratic Coalition Against Trump filed the first reported Hatch Act complaint against FBI Director Comey in the wake of his unusual memo Friday afternoon.
Yesterday, Professor Richard Painter filed his own Hatch Act and ethics complaint against the FBI Director and an ethics complaint over the same memo, which is also drawing the ire of the career professionals at the top federal investigatory agency.
Painter explained his actions in a New York Times op-ed column.
The joint statement reads:
James Comey used his power as head of the FBI to attempt to influence a Presidential election. This is drastic violation of the Hatch Act that extends beyond party lines. When Comey was pressured by members of the United States House of Representatives to send a letter detailing the his investigation into Secretary Clinton’s emails, he should have known that the contents would be made public. The Members who released this letter placed partisan politics above the integrity of the FBI. We hope that investigations into Comey’s actions begin swiftly and are resolved with the same expediency.
“A confidential letter that nobody would release would not be a violation of the Hatch Act," said Richard Painter. "The Members used Comey, and he let himself be used, and for that, his actions should be investigated."
“The criticisms of Comey's actions are coming from both sides of the aisle,” said Scott Dworkin, senior advisor to the Coalition, “at some point we have to take a step back and realize that that this goes above politics, above the Presidential election- this is about misuse of power by someone charged with the task of keeping our country safe. If we can't trust Comey to stay out of partisan politics, as all federal employees are required to do, how can we expect him to protect us?”