President Donald Trump accused media outlets on Tuesday morning of incorrectly reporting that he can’t find a replacement for John Kelly as White House chief of staff.
Fake News has it purposely wrong. Many, over ten, are vying for and wanting the White House Chief of Staff position. Why wouldn’t someone want one of the truly great and meaningful jobs in Washington. Please report news correctly. Thank you!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 11, 2018
“Fake News has it purposely wrong,” Trump wrote, adding that more than 10 people were actually “vying for and wanting” the position.
However, Twitter users tittered at the phrasing of his tweet, which they said appeared to suggest that many of the applicants were over 10 years old:
give the job to a nine-year-old you cowards https://t.co/b5jZ9loeRH
— Matthew Champion (@matthewchampion) December 11, 2018
I'm glad you're only considering people over ten for the job.
— Nate Bell (@NateBell4AR) December 11, 2018
At least they should be more mature than you.
Oh why rule out the under tens? Am sure they’d do a great job 👍
— Sheila O'Flanagan (@sheilaoflanagan) December 11, 2018
Okay, so they're all over 10 years old. Now name them.
— o'neill (@johnoneillnyc) December 11, 2018
Too bad my son is 8 years old.that job is perfect for him😩😩😩
— Iaminthemodz (@iaminthemodz) December 11, 2018
Not legally able to work yet at 10 yrs old. Maybe try a different pool of candidates.
— Hand Me My Armor (@IamKarenDe) December 11, 2018
Out of luck, 9-year olds!
— Allan (@AllanRicharz) December 11, 2018
"Many, over ten"
— James Michael Sama (@JamesMSama) December 11, 2018
In other words, lots of 11 and 12 year olds want this job. We are in the clear!
When you say; “over ten,” I assume you mean age.
— J Roller (@gammajeff) December 11, 2018
On first read I seriously thought this was a parody account and he was interviewing 10+ year olds for the CoS position....long morning, stuck in a Dallas airport on a layover.
— Hank the Tank🇺🇸 (@Corsair502) December 11, 2018
So you have candidates, under 10, vying for this position? Sounds like a good fit.
— dawn¥♡ (@dawnfayemarie) December 11, 2018
I'm glad you're only considering people over ten for the job.
— Nate Bell (@NateBell4AR) December 11, 2018
At least they should be more mature than you.
Over ten? Do you mean over ten years old? Yeah, you probably do. pic.twitter.com/AByN155S2Q
— Ginger Taylor (@GingerofSalem) December 11, 2018
Oh wow, you've got tweens fighting tobrun your staff. Impressive.
— ❤️🖤❤️🖤❤️ #UniteAndConquer (@thrillout) December 11, 2018
“many, over ten”
— Jason Bailey (@jasondashbailey) December 11, 2018
I’m dead you guys https://t.co/aXERSDSD8O
It also hard to tell if he means "over ten" like an age cutoff. Like, he'll take a precocious 12 year old. pic.twitter.com/ONjIjex2sw
— BiblioKlu (@biblioklu) December 11, 2018
"Many, over ten..." Genuinely read this as many people over ten years old 🙄 https://t.co/o6cxnriOz5
— Hope Dellon (@hopedellon) December 11, 2018
By the way... "over ten"? Don't they have to be at least 18 to work there?
— Leo (@Maquissar) December 11, 2018
Lemme guess: Tomi Lahren, Ted Nugent, Sean Hannity, Jacob Wohl, Scott Baio, Roseanne, and Jon Voight. #OnlyTheBestPeople
— Gina Bradbury (@screaminggina) December 11, 2018
Is Scott Free one of them?
— Leyland's Lung (@LeylandsLung) December 11, 2018
Ten? Let me guess? Jared, Ivanka, Kellyanne, Baron, Scott Pruitt, Don Jr., Eric, Sean Hannity, Jean Pirro and Dinesh D'Souza.
— Jordan Barab (@jbarab) December 11, 2018
Am I right?
Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Vixen, Comet, Cupid, Donner, Blitzen, Rudolph & Olive?
— Heather Ross (@OhEwe) December 11, 2018
Support HuffPost
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.
Would you join us to help keep our stories free for all? Your contribution of as little as $2 will go a long way.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you’ll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.