Among the most unfortunate side effects of the modern education system is that it conditions many of us to. In the protracted college admissions process that is middle school and high school, mistakes translate into low scores which in turn reduce the likelihood of getting into top schools. Given the reward structure of the education system, we learn over time to place more weight on avoiding mistakes than we do on breaking new ground and experimenting with new ideas. Not only is this bad practice for the next generation of would-be innovators and thought leaders, but it also sets people up for a tough adjustment to the working world, where bringing original thought to the table is expected of them. Remember, whether it's explicitly part of your job description or not, .
To be clear, making mistakes is not the same thing as being creative. But if you aren't at least prepared to make mistakes you will never accomplish anything original. Becoming a "thought leader" in your organization, much less your field demands that bring original thinking that compels people to pay attention. Bold ideas naturally involve some risk, and part of being an innovator and a good leader in general is honing your risk tolerance so that you know when to when to hold back and when to bet big.
You also need to be able to communicate your message effectively. Once you've already established your reputation, people will listen to your ideas simply because they're your ideas. But without the halo of an established reputation, all you've got are the strength of your ideas and your ability to sell people on them.
Three Defining Traits of a Thought Leader
- (Obvious alert!) Other people need to actually consider you a thought leader, which means they need to be aware of your ideas in the first place
- Your ideas obviously must be important, compelling, and at least somewhat novel
- You must be able to convince others to change their behavior or views based on your ideas
The Seven Types of Failed Thought Leaders
- The Worker Bee - Many of us start our careers as worker bees. . This person hopes that their hard work alone will propel them upward, and it does at first. Their ideas tend to be efficiency-oriented, incremental, and uncontroversial, while others set their objectives for them. In strong organizations, worker bees who don't demonstrate broader thinking skills eventually disqualify themselves for certain assignments and leadership roles because others perceive their demeanor as symptomatic of a lack of boldness and imagination.
- The Wallflower - The wallflower looks like a worker bee from afar, but unlike the worker bee she actually does have substantive ideas bounding around in her head. Unfortunately, Wallflowers are either too shy or ambivalent to stand behind their ideas and risk possible embarrassment. They might share their thoughts in private or during one-on-one meetings when the stakes are low, but they don't work at getting "air time" for their ideas, and so they never take hold.
- The Silent Dissenter - There isn't a company in the world that doesn't have at least a few of these roaming the halls. You know the type: They spot all sorts of inefficiencies or problems with how the business operates, but they never take it upon themselves to fix it. When the problems are either addressed or turn into even larger problems, the Silent Dissenter is always there to say, "I've been saying we need to do this forever." Woulda, coulda, shoulda.
- The One-and-Done - I have let myself fall into this role multiple times, and the result is almost always the same. The One-and-Done has what they think is a great idea, iterates on it for a while, mentions it to someone once, and then never follows up again. Bonus points for expecting a lengthy email to magically cut through the clutter for a manager who gets more than one hundred emails a day. Just writing this description is making me cringe as I think back on how many times I've done this.
- The Outsourcer - This person gets a little further than the One-and-Done, but doesn't want to do the work involved in turning their idea into real action. If the idea is so good that others immediately grasp the benefit for themselves you may get lucky and they'll see it through (though you'll get less credit for the idea). Usually though, if you're not involved in seeing your idea through to the end, it won't get there. In this context, being called an "Idea Man" is definitely not a compliment.
- The Willy Loman - Named after the protagonist in Arthur Miller's Death of a Salesman, this person just doesn't understand how to shepherd an idea through the acceptance and adoption phases. Whether they're talking to the wrong people, laying out unconvincing arguments, or failing to consider other people's motivations, this poor person just can't get things off the ground even when they might be on to something.
- The Quixotic Loner - Not every idea can be a winner, and no one nails it every time. The Quixotic Loner just doesn't know when to let an idea go or put it back on the shelf for a little bit. This a particularly tough label to assign because championing new ideas that imply big changes for others feels like toiling in futility when you're trying to drive acceptance and adoption. Still, some ideas just deserve to die. The more ideas you generate, the less likely you are to find yourself in this stage, because you won't over-invest in ideas that are either fatally flawed or otherwise unworkable in your present situation.
Of course, sometimes, the inability to drive adoption within your company or peer group means that you need to take your talents elsewhere. Many if not most of the most brilliant people in history were seen by others as quixotic loners (or worse) until they were proven right. You have to ask yourself if adoption of your idea is possible in your present environment. If it isn't, then you need to decide whether the best thing to do is adapt your idea, drop it, find a new environment, or create your own.
Join the conversation at Smart Like How if you're interested in learning more.