Don't Let Bad Estate-Planning Make You Homeless!

Transferring your home to your children is a clumsy method of trying to accomplish your estate-planning goals. Having counseled thousands of families , I can tell you that this well-intentioned transfer is more likely to do harm than good.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

As an estate planning attorney, I am often asked to transfer clients homes into their children's names. The reasons given for the request include a desire to avoid probate, reduce estate taxes and to protect the home in event of long-term care claims. These are certainly worthy objectives. However, transferring your home to your children is a clumsy method of trying to accomplish your estate-planning goals. Having counseled thousands of families over the years, I can tell you that this well-intentioned transfer is more likely to do harm than good.

Problem No. 1: Property Taxes Will Increase

If you receive any property tax discounts because you are a senior, a veteran, or widow of a veteran, they will be lost if your children own the home.

Problem No. 2: Children's Liabilities Can Harm You

If you ignore my advice and transfer the home to your kids, the house is now vulnerable to their potential legal problems. With a national divorce rate of at least 50 percent, you may well live to witness a claim on your (former) home by your soon-to-be-ex daughter-in-law.

The same holds true for other types of claims. Bankruptcy, judgment creditors, or lawsuits against your children will now affect your home.

If you are not yet convinced, consider the following real-life cautionary tale:

A judge asked his daughter and her family to move in with him after his wife passed away. One day, a lawyer friend suggested that the judge "turn the house over" to his daughter. This sounded like a fine idea. They were extremely close and he had no concerns that his daughter ever would or could jeopardize his security. Several months after title to the home was transferred, something unexpected happened -- the daughter died! Guess what she never got around to doing in her 34 years? You guessed it -- a will. Without a will your state of residence decides who will receive your property. In the case of the judge's daughter, her husband received one-half and her 4-year-old son received the other half. Dad was totally exposed. Beside himself with anxiety, he sprang for a consultation with a so-called "white shoe" law firm in New York City to assess his options. Guess what they told him? Correct -- there was nothing he could do to reverse the transfer. And, by the way, asked the attorney, "Did you file a gift tax return?" What?! There are federal gift tax-filing requirements on transfers (i.e., gifts) in excess of $13,000 per person per year. Several months later, the son-in-law announced that he was starting to date again and it would be terribly awkward to bring lady friends to the house with his dead wife's father living there. Perhaps it would be healthier for everyone if "Dad" made other living arrangements.

By giving away the house, you have simply exchanged your potential tax and health care liabilities for the children's possible problems. Wouldn't it be better to protect yourself and your family from both sets of troubles?

A properly drafted trust can help you to protect your home against liabilities (yours and your children's), avoid probate and preserve your tax benefits. Just remember, that before signing on the dotted line, you need to ensure that the trust gives you lifetime ownership rights. After all, a good estate plan should put your security and peace of mind first.

Popular in the Community

Close

HuffPost Shopping’s Best Finds

MORE IN LIFE