For years, deregulation and the Internet have been pulling us into a more decentralized and freelance economy, in which there's wider consumer choice, albeit with stagnant pay and a decline in person-to-person service that forces us to do more tasks ourselves that were previously done by those dinosaurs called "employees."
Consider Uber. As I discovered when one of my daughters pulled out her iPhone a couple of years ago on a busy Manhattan street to summon an Uber driver, it's sometimes faster to find one of these mobile freelancers than it is to find a regulated Yellow Cab in a big city.
But the cabs, being regulated, function as a public utility. They have to meet certain basic minimums of availability, cleanliness and safety that can't be imposed on the likes of Uber, whose drivers are, of course, not obligated to provide services in the same way as cabbies. I don't think that we want unregulated drivers to totally replace generally reliable and regulated cabbies.
Long before Uber, of course, there was the partial deregulation of the airlines. While this led initially to lower prices for many travelers, it has also made travel more chaotic and unpredictable. And deregulation, the "hub-and-spoke'' system and relentless airline mergers mean that mid-size cities get shorted on flights.
While better electronics systems make planes less likely to crash these days than three decades ago, air travel itself is increasingly miserable.
In the old, tightly regulated days, figuring out airline schedules and fares was comparatively easy. Now it's an ordeal, and conditions within airplanes are increasingly crowded and unhealthy. And as the airlines, like other businesses, seek to outsource service to computers so that they can lay off more people, addressing problems by communicating with customer-service humans gets tougher.
Then there's the new do-it-yourself, deregulated and decentralized energy world. Consider that many affluent folks are saving money and reducing their carbon footprints by having solar panels installed on their roofs. Good in itself! But this takes business away from the utility companies, which could jeopardize the viability of the huge electric grids that utilities maintain. We'll continue to need that grid to support modern society, with its ever-increasing supply of electronic devices.
Might not it be better if we put more focus on producing green electricity with huge solar-panel arrays and wind-turbine farms maintained by utilities that serve everyone -- rich and poor?
The Obama administration has worked very hard to craft a deal with Iran to try to get it to at least postpone continued work on nuclear weapons.
But the administration's effort will probably turn out to have been in vain. For one thing, the corrupt theocratic dictatorship that runs Iran will cheat and cheat as it evades inspections. It may receive technical help in this cheating from the likes of fellow police states Russia and China, two of the signatories to the nuclear deal, which will happily sell them militarily useful stuff.
Iran will almost certainly use the billions of dollars freed up by the ending of economic sanctions to increase its troublemaking. Iran's regime seeks to dominate the Middle East -- partly to protect and promote its fellow Shiites and partly because domination is fun and profitable for its leaders. And Tehran hasn't really toned down its "Death to America and Israel'' rhetoric.
Now we have made the "mullahs" more macho. No wonder Iran's neighborhood is scared.
Some complain that America, as the first nuclear power, is hypocritical in trying to keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of other nations. That seeks to make an equivalence between a democratic nation like America and a dictatorship like Iran. And remember why we started our nuclear-weapons program in the first place -- to defend ourselves from Germany's mass-murdering Nazi regime, which was working hard to create an atomic bomb.
Some say that expanding trade with Iran will somehow make it kindlier. They said that about Germany before World War I and China now. Nations have other reasons besides economics to be nasty -- for instance, paranoia, power for the sake of power and religion.
Robert Whitcomb (email@example.com) is a Providence-based writer and editor. He's a partner at Cambridge Management Group (cmg625.com), a healthcare-sector consultancy, and a Fellow at the Pell Center. A former finance editor of the International Herald Tribune, he's chairman of the Providence Committee on Foreign Relations (thepcfr.org).