Court Refuses Dylann Roof's Request To Dismiss Indian And Jewish Lawyers (UPDATED)

The court-appointed attorneys are working with Roof, who killed nine people in a Charleston church in 2015, to appeal a federal death sentence.
Dylann Roof is escorted into the court room at the Charleston County Judicial Center in Charleston, South Carolina on April 10, 2017.
Dylann Roof is escorted into the court room at the Charleston County Judicial Center in Charleston, South Carolina on April 10, 2017.

Update (Sept. 20, 2017): The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused Dylann Roof’s request to fire his Jewish and Indian lawyers, The Associated Press reported.

“The court denies the motion for substitution of counsel on appeal,” the judges wrote on Tuesday.


White supremacist and convicted mass murderer Dylann Roof has petitioned to remove two lawyers from his defense team.

Roof claimed it was “impossible” for him to “trust” his court-appointed attorneys, according to a handwritten letter filed Monday with the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, that was obtained by BuzzFeed and reported on earlier by South Carolina’s The State. Roof identified the attorneys, Alexandra Yates and Sapna Mirchandani, as Jewish and Indian, respectively. He also described them as his “political and biological enemies.”

Because of their race, he wrote, it was “quite literally impossible that they and I could have the same interests relating to my case.”

Roof, 23, killed nine people at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, South Carolina, during a 2015 shooting rampage. He later said he’d hoped the slayings would ignite a race war.

In December, Roof was convicted in federal court of 33 hate crime charges related to the shooting. He was sentenced to death for his crimes.

Yates and Mirchandani were appointed to Roof’s case after the sentencing, according to The Post and Courier. The attorneys are now working to appeal his death sentence.

In his recent petition, Roof requested that Yates and Mirchandani be dismissed from his defense team and “replaced.”

“I am confident after meeting my current attorneys that they will be unable to represent me in an efficient manner,” he wrote, noting that he had clashed with his former attorney, the renowned death penalty lawyer David Bruck, who is Jewish.

Bruck’s “ethnicity was a constant source of conflict even with my constant efforts to look past it,” Roof wrote.

Roof had sought to represent himself but ended up permitting Bruck to take the role of lead counsel during the guilt phase of his trial. He told Bruck that he hated him and would kill him if he was ever released from prison. In response to plans by his attorneys to present a mental health defense, Roof called his legal team the “sneakiest people I ever met.”

UPDATE: This story has been updated to show the court’s refusal of Roof’s request.

Go To Homepage

Before You Go

Popular in the Community