Elizabeth Warren: Sequestration Is 'Mindless,' Hits Head Start While Big Oil Sucks Down Tax Subsidies

Key Federal Services Get Hit While Big Oil Sucks Down Tax Subsidies. What's Up With That?
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 11: U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) questions witnesses during a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on 'Mitigating Systemic Risk Through Wall Street Reforms,' on Capitol Hill, July 11, 2013 in Washington, DC. The committee heard from the panel about the progress being made on reform provisions that improve financial stability. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 11: U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) questions witnesses during a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on 'Mitigating Systemic Risk Through Wall Street Reforms,' on Capitol Hill, July 11, 2013 in Washington, DC. The committee heard from the panel about the progress being made on reform provisions that improve financial stability. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) tore into sequestration during a meeting with constituents on Wednesday, attacking the automatic spending cuts as a careless solution that has left vital programs reeling while ignoring big-ticket items.

"Sequestration is the most mindless way to cut spending, because it's blunt and across the board," Warren said, according to The Republican. "I believe we should be spending more on cyber research and development than we did five years ago. Yet in sequestration, they get cut along with (overall defense spending)."

The cuts -- which began earlier this year after congressional inaction and are split evenly between defense and non-defense categories -- have done significant damage to a number of programs across various sectors. Warren specifically criticized the blow dealt to Meals on Wheels, a food program for seniors, and Head Start, the federal pre-K education service for low-income families. She also noted that Congress hadn't done anything to tap into the oil industry's large tax subsidies.

"Sequestration hits Meals on Wheels and [Head Start] because they receive money from the government," Warren continued. "But look at the other side. The oil industry continues to suck down billions of dollars in tax subsidies. Because there is no expenditure, it continues to be as big as the edge of the loophole. The tax breaks, as we go through this financial contraction, become even more powerful than they were and they aren't even on the chopping block the same way. I think that's fundamentally wrong and the wrong approach."

As HuffPost's Arthur Delaney reported in June, sequestration has made a particularly harsh impact on Meals on Wheels:

Meals On Wheels surveyed 640 of its local member organizations on how they've coped since the cuts took effect in March. Forty percent of programs have eliminated staff positions. Seventy percent are putting more people on waiting lists, increasing the number of those on waiting lists by an average of 58 seniors per list. And programs have cut an average of 364 meals per week.

Local programs have continued to feel the pain of the automatic cuts over the past couple months as well.

Head Start has also been hit hard by sequestration. A recent report found that the program has eliminated services for more than 57,000 children in the coming school year due to the cuts.

Tax provisions for oil companies remain fully intact, meanwhile, at an annual cost of around $4 billion to the federal government. President Barack Obama has repeatedly and unsuccessfully proposed eliminating many of these subsidies, upsetting members of the oil and gas industry who have claimed that they don't receive preferential treatment in the tax code.

Before You Go

Hillary Rodham Clinton

Which Women Might Run In 2016?

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot