Experts Slam DoD Waste in Book for Obama

The United States been stuck in a century-old military strategy, spending too much money for too little ability to wage a modern war, and?
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Read the stunning new book from the Center for Defense Information (CDI) on the long-term budgeting weaknesses and strategic blunders of the DoD. It's a remarkably good read as well as offering a buffet of common-sense reforms for the new President and Congress.

Rep. Barney Frank has already called for a 25 percent cut in the military budget. The budget may be hard to cut that much right away because of the overstretched troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, but the new book makes clear many ways to save money in the out-of-control military budget without diminishing U.S. security..

The book, America's Defense Meltdown: Pentagon Reform for President Obama and the New Congress, is out just two weeks after the election, exemplifying one of the themes that runs through it, namely the importance of speed and the ponderous nature of America's dug-in military apparatus, which is critiqued as stuck in the century-old second generation of four generations of warfare. The eleven chapters of the book are written by 13 retired Pentagon insiders, retired military officers and defense specialists. The book is edited by Winslow T. Wheeler (photo at left), Director of CDI's Straus Military Reform Project. CDI has itself found a home in the World Security Institute. Wheeler worked for 31 years for U.S. Senators from both political parties and the Government Accountability Office. His earlier book, The Wastrels of Defense, was published by the U.S. Naval Institute Press. The book (a 2.3 meg PDF file) can be read for time being online at I have been up most of last night reading it - it is fascinating.

The scope of the first chapter by Lt. Col. John Sayers (U.S. Marine Corps, ret.) is global and deeply rooted in history. He observes that for most of human history wars have been fought in first-generation mode, with independently assembled military units engaged in close order drills. The Thirty Years War, largely a battle between Catholics and Protestants, led to the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia, which ushered in the modern era dominated by centralized nation states.

The second generation of warfare began at the end of the 19th century with the rivalry between Germany and Britain. The jingoistic industrialized states were able to step up their long-range firepower and support large battalions, leading to the trench warfare of World War I, a war of attrition in Europe that was disastrous for all the combatants. The United States, coming late to the war, lost perhaps as many as 250,000 troops in Europe. (This is 2.5 percent of the 10 million military personnel lost during the war. In addition, there were 9 million civilian deaths and 21 million wounded. Almost an entire generation of young men was lost in the major combatant countries.)

Already at the end of World War I, with their forces depleted, the Germans were trying a third generation of warfare, more decentralized and maneuverable. Sayers says that this approach was extended by the Germans effectively in World War II and was imitated by the Chinese in Korea and by the Viet Cong during the Vietnam War.

Nowadays, we are engaged largely in a fourth-generation war. With a loss of nation-state controls in many parts of the world, independent paramilitary groups have arisen, such as FARC in Colombia, or al Qaeda, or the Chechen rebels in Russia. Parts of Iraq are controlled by independent Sunni, Shiite and Kurdish forces. It's a reversion to the days before the Treaty of Westphalia. (The independent groups behave the way SPECTRE does in the Ian Fleming novels - they have specific objectives and they fight to achieve them.)

Sayers says we should have moved a long time ago to third-generation and fourth-generation readiness -- with smaller and more maneuverable forces. He does not think the large nations have any interest in another war of attrition of the size that the United States prepared for during the Cold War.

Why has the United States been stuck in a century-old military strategy, spending too much money for too little ability to wage a modern war? Here are some of the reasons he advances:

- Budget gaming leads to frontloading and political engineering of weapons systems (Gordon Adams wrote about this 30 years ago in The Iron Triangle), with the result that the weapons are too big, too complex and unreliable.
- U.S. military forces are led by officers who are inadequately trained to lead, contributing to tbe unpreparedness of the troops.
- For both these reasons, defense costs rise faster than planned for in defense budgets and have become "ruinously expensive."

Sayers ends the chapter describing the U.S. military creature as a "weak-muscled elephant that cannot even deal effectively with mice."

The other ten chapters go on in the same vein, urging reassessment of the way that war-making decisions are made and critiquing a failed military personnel system, overdependence on foreign bases, lack of mobility of forces on sea and land, overdependence on technicians, excessive faith in the value of strategic bombing as opposed to air-to-air and close-support operations, misuse of the National Guard for overseas duty, excessive faith in technology and inadequate tracking of defense spending.

Read the book! Here's the link again to the free online file while it works:

Go To Homepage

Before You Go

Popular in the Community