Federal Document Proves Donald Trump Practiced Housing Discrimination in New York City

A new federal government document has surfaced which details the housing discrimination practices of Donald Trump and his family's vast realty holdings of the private Trump Organization in New York City's outer boroughs of Queens and Brooklyn.

This first time that tangible proof of Donald Trump's history of racial discrimination practices has been quantified, firmly, in an official record.

This is undeniable.

The Democratic Coalition Against Trump found this key, first #TrumpLeaks document from the archives of University of Michigan's Law School, and it is the very first time that the complete list of Trump's covered properties has been discovered.

Republican nominee Donald Trump spent most of the 1970s battling federal housing discrimination charges alongside his father, a fact Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton highlighted in an attack ad this week.

But Trump has always publicly denied culpability and hid behind the confidentiality of settlement discussions to avoid full disclosure like this new public record document exposes. In fact, Trump has always never admitted guilt according to Politifact last month:

The case was settled and Trump never admitted guilt, though his company had to agree to stipulations meant to prevent future discrimination at his rental properties.

Donald Trump’s Properties Had 75% Fewer Minorities Than Lived Nearby In Other Buildings

The Trump Organization had 9,050 apartment units covered under the settlement agreement with the federal government, which housed only 399 minority residents across 35 covered properties, or only 4.4% of Fred and Donald Trump's New York City rental real estate empire.

The public record document proves the Trump Organization and principals Fred and Donald Trump’s buildings schemed to ignore the Fair Housing Act of 1968, failed miserably and landed the duo court for two years starting in 1973.

The Trumps capitulated to the government in 1975.

Keep in mind that the federal government named Donald Trump personally in their Fair Housing complaint, so he wasn't just a bit player in the dark history of his family business' illegal management practices, but a named defendant.

Trump was one of two bosses sued.

The Justice Department named 39 buildings in their original complaint, which led to a story entitled, "Major Landlord Accused of Antiblack Bias," on the front page of the New York Times.

Out of the total of 14,000 units that The Times says the Trump family owned in 1973, 68% of their holdings fell under the settlement.

The Trumps segregated a small group of non-white tenants into a few of their properties, maintained a single building with just over half minority residents and virtually excluded minorities from 24 New York City buildings of the 36 total project covered in their 1975 settlement with the federal government which covered a mind-boggling 9,500 apartments.

The average unit size across their portfolio of buildings covered in the federal settlement was 263 units per project.

Five of the Trump buildings affected had no minority residents whatsoever, and more than half of the buildings had less than ten minority residents.

The above statistics exclude a single project listed with over 230 minority tenants in a 440 unit building, but oddly was included in the settlement anyhow.

There’s also spreadsheet below with easier to read copy of the key public record document proving Trump’s discriminatory housing practices, but you can see the original here:

Who Wrote This Letter At The Department of Justice Civil Rights Division And Why Did They Write It?

Drew S. Days, III transmitted the Trump Leak (below) to the Open Housing Center of New York shortly after his appointment by President Carter. It was prepared by career Civil Rights division lawyer Harvey L. Hanley in the summer of 1977,

Days, was the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Civil Rights division then, where he personally oversaw the Trump family's desegregation efforts.

He went on to become a Yale Law Professor, and eventually the US Solicitor General under President Clinton in 1993.

Days' memo reveals that the portfolio of Trump Organization realty which was covered in the 1975 settlement, and their slow progress of racial integration as of July 11th, 1977.

By then, the Trump Organization had designated two additional buildings to accommodate significant blocks minority renters compared to other buildings.

But across the board, non-white occupancy rates only went from 4.4% to 7.2% with 663 residents of color housed.

When you factor out those two buildings - named Argyle Hall and Westminster Hall who accepted 48 of only 264 new minority tenants - the Trump Organization's overall minority occupancy rate stood at only 6.45%.

Trump Organization Management Actively Discriminated Against African-Americans

The New York Times reported in August that Trump's property managers - both New York and Cincinnati, Ohio - marked minority housing applications for denial whether they were segregationists or more likely following their orders strictly. One manager spilled the beans on Trump's discriminatory practices:

A former Trump superintendent named Thomas Miranda testified that multiple Trump Management employees had instructed him to attach a separate piece of paper with a big letter “C” on it — for “colored” — to any application filed by a black apartment-seeker.

That wasn’t only reason to date why the federal Department of Justice's Civil Rights division monitored fully 2/3rds of the Trump family's realty empire for racial discrimination in the 70s.

Case records like the one provided by DCAT below show that Trump’s manager would tell prospective tenants that their neighborhoods were safe, “because there were no blacks around.”

Furthermore, as in many housing discrimination cases, the below court document also documents testers visiting the Trump Organization’s buildings and coming out with different results based on the skin color of the prospective tenant.

Court Documents: US vs. Trump
Court Documents: US vs. Trump

New York’s Minority Population Doubled In the 1970s

It’s important to note that demographic data from the US Census illuminates this report to show that most of Trump’s buildings had far fewer minorities than the communities in which they sat.

US Census data indicates that Kings and Queens Counties were the two most populous counties in New York back then, with 4.6 million people in 1970. (doc 2, page 11 in link)

Roughly 20% of that 1970 population was listed as African-American.

By the 1980 US Census, the population of the two New York City boroughs dipped slightly, however the percentage of African-American and hispanic residents in the two boroughs was 40% of the population. (pages 29-30 in link)

This data demonstrates that the Trump Organization’s covered apartments only had one fourth of the proportion of minority residents compared their surrounding neighborhoods in the mid-1970s, while 15% percent of their properties had zero African-Americans residing inside them.

For the purposes of this story, we used the blended average of minority population in both districts, since there’s a large portfolio of buildings.

Census Data from 1970 and 1980 from Brooklyn, NY and Queens, NY
Census Data from 1970 and 1980 from Brooklyn, NY and Queens, NY

Conclusion

Donald Trump settled a federal Fair Housing Act lawsuit because most of his buildings often had few, or even no minority residents.

A careful examination of his record shows that his family’s real estate empire systematically excluded African-Americans from its housing, and even after settling with the US Department of Justice, the Trump Organization continued to use the same tactics of loading just a few properties with most of the minority tenants.

The Open Housing Center of New York would later file a lawsuit against Donald Trump in 1982 for housing discrimination, which the Trump Organization settled in 1984.

The Republican nominee has denied guilt for years.

Donald Trump’s denial of the many federal housing discrimination charges he racked up in the 1970s - and which made him wealthy - can only be seen as a lie in light of this new factual information.

This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
CONVERSATIONS