Financial Times' Europe Editor Calls Charlie Hebdo 'Stupid,' Accuses Paper Of 'Muslim Baiting'

A person reads the latest issue of the French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Paris on January 7, 2015, after gunmen arm
A person reads the latest issue of the French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Paris on January 7, 2015, after gunmen armed with Kalashnikovs and a rocket-launcher opened fire in the offices of the weekly in Paris, killing at least 11. AFP PHOTO / BERTRAND GUAY (Photo credit should read BERTRAND GUAY/AFP/Getty Images)

The Financial Times' Europe editor, Tony Barber, has accused the satirical French newspaper Charlie Hebdo of "Muslim-baiting" after 12 people were killed and others wounded Wednesday in a terror attack at Charlie Hebdo's office in Paris.

Barber leveled his charge in an opinion piece published Wednesday afternoon, hours after three masked gunmen stormed Charlie Hebdo's newsroom and opened fire. Witnesses say the shooters shouted "Allahu Akbar" and "we have avenged the prophet," before fleeing in a waiting car.

Charlie Hebdo regularly mocks world religions and political figures, but has faced serious threats and a 2011 firebombing for its satire on Islam and the publication of cartoons featuring the Prophet Muhammad. Among the dead Wednesday were four of the paper's cartoonists.

"Charlie Hebdo has a long record of mocking, baiting and needling French Muslims," Barber writes, pointing a finger at the paper for inciting the violence. "France is the land of Voltaire, but too often editorial foolishness has prevailed at Charlie Hebdo."

He continued:

This is not in the slightest to condone the murderers, who must be caught and punished, or to suggest that freedom of expression should not extend to satirical portrayals of religion. It is merely to say that some common sense would be useful at publications such as Charlie Hebdo, and Denmark’s Jyllands-Posten, which purport to strike a blow for freedom when they provoke Muslims, but are actually just being stupid.

The column has already accrued more than 500 comments at Financial Times, many of them critical and unforgiving.

"This article is appalling in its insensitivity to those who were killed and injured in today's horrific and totally unjustifiable attack," reads one comment. "Although the author states that he does not condone the murders, he is, by writing that the staff at the magazine lacked common-sense, insinuating that the victims brought this on themselves. Shocking and shameful."

Another describes the piece as "indescribably tasteless," both due to its content, and the fact that Foreign Times published it "as people lie bleeding in hospital, and as they carry the bodybags across Paris."

UPDATE: In an email to The Huffington Post, an Financial Times spokesperson emphasized Barber wrote the piece as a columnist, not as a representative of The Financial Times. FT's editorial response to the assault, which they've labeled "a murderous attack on freedom of expression," can be read here.