America's most polarizing novelist strikes again. Aside from penning best-selling, Pulitzer-finalist novels, Jonathan Franzen's hobbies include birdwatching and grumpily critiquing everything from the looks of classic female authors to the Internet at large.
Among his long-standing feuds with things most people like is an ongoing back-and-forth with writer Jennifer Weiner, who called attention to the fact that the themes in his novels -- family and personal relationships -- would've rendered similar stories penned by women less important.
Today, Butler University's journal Booth ran an interview with the writer, in which he said of Weiner, "To me it seems she’s freeloading on the legitimate problem of gender bias in the canon, and over the years in the major review organs, to promote herself, basically."
Weiner quipped about the news on Twitter:
As was the case in all previous Franzen kerfuffles, the Twitter remarks made by other writers ranged from jocular put-downs to impassioned rants against his work:
Some tweeters defended Franzen, saying the interviewer's questions backed the writer into a corner:
And still others defended the quality of his work:
"My desires are ... unconventional."
*Reads and enjoys Jonathan Franzen's nonfiction.*
— Ned Resnikoff (@resnikoff) February 13, 2015
Perhaps the ongoing feud between the two writers will worm its way into the forthcoming biography of Franzen's 55 years of life on earth, slated to release later this year.
CORRECTION: A previous version of this article incorrectly stated that Jonathan Franzen had won a Pulitzer. His novel The Corrections was a finalist for the 2002 prize, but he has not been awarded the prize. The post has been updated to correct this.