Amid the debate over nominating a replacement for the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, former Sen. George Mitchell (D-Maine) spoke with HuffPost Live on Wednesday about why he declined a chance to be appointed to the Supreme Court in 1994.
Mitchell, who also served as the Senate majority leader from 1989 to 1995, told host Caroline Modarressy-Tehrani he ultimately turned down President Bill Clinton's offer to nominate him to the court because he and Sen. John Chafee (R-R.I.) were working to pass health care legislation in the Senate.
"When the opening of the Supreme Court occurred, the president asked me if he could appoint me to the Supreme Court. I said, 'Look, there are plenty of good lawyers, probably much better than me, who could serve on the court. But I think we got a shot at this health care thing,'" Mitchell said. He advised the president to find someone else.
"Of course, I was wrong," Mitchell said. "We couldn't agree and the bill went down, but I made the best decision I could under the circumstances."
"I think about that one," Mitchell said of Bush v. Gore, which ended a manual recount of votes in Florida after the 2000 elections, clearing the way for George W. Bush to become president. "When someone begins an opinion by saying, 'This is not to be used as precedent by anybody else,' you gotta be suspicious of what's in it. I thought that was a terrible opinion."
Ultimately, though, Mitchell doesn't regret his decision. "You make the best choice you can, based on the facts and the circumstances which exist at the time, and don't spend your life agonizing about it," he said.
Click here to watch Mitchell's full conversation with HuffPost Live.
Also on HuffPost: