Now that a cycle has run its course and it feels like a whole century has passed since the Sunday of the referendum, I dare ask the sacrilegious question: What would have possibly happened had we voted "YES"?
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
A demonstrator makes the victory sign in front of a banner, depicting a medal ball reading ''NO'' and destroying a wall with anti-austerity measures as another one waves a Greek flag during a rally in Athens, Friday, June 10, 2015. Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras sought his left-wing party's backing on Friday for a new budget austerity package that is harsher than what he urged Greeks to reject in a vote just last week, but would provide the country will longer-term financial support. (AP Photo/Petros Karadjias)
A demonstrator makes the victory sign in front of a banner, depicting a medal ball reading ''NO'' and destroying a wall with anti-austerity measures as another one waves a Greek flag during a rally in Athens, Friday, June 10, 2015. Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras sought his left-wing party's backing on Friday for a new budget austerity package that is harsher than what he urged Greeks to reject in a vote just last week, but would provide the country will longer-term financial support. (AP Photo/Petros Karadjias)

What if we had voted "YES"?

Now that a cycle has run its course and it feels like a whole century has passed since the Sunday of the referendum, I dare ask the sacrilegious question: What would have possibly happened had we voted "YES"? The reality would have barely been any different. On Monday the banks would have been closed. The economy would be melting rapidly. Retirees would melt in queues under the sun. The country and its banks would still need a loan of colossal proportions to remain alive. And the terms for its disbursement would still be tough.

But while the reality wouldn't have changed, the political climate would definitely be different, even if it is impossible to guess how. Perhaps Antonis Samaras wouldn't have quit, poor Varoufakis may have not given his exit papers, the meeting of heads probably wouldn't have happened, the almost unanimous approval of the parliament to negotiate would not have been given. And it would definitely have been harder to politically adjust to this violent crash of reality that Alexis Tsipras so traumatically experienced in Brussels and so honestly described in his interview with Greek Radio-Television and his speech to the Parliament. Because while the shock of colliding with reality would have been just as violent, as he lived it (and as we lived it), there would be many that would say to us: "See what you get for voting 'yes', despondent, fearful fellow citizens? Had you voted 'no', none of this would have happened, the Europeans would have fearfully collapsed in front of our feet and offered us the most excellent agreement, with rivers of money, without terms, without memorandums."

And we would have believed them. Or we would have been consumed by doubt.

Thankfully "NO" won. Call it "the wisdom of the masses," call it "an irony of history" or call it application of the iron law of unintended consequences that usually pervades in the actions of political protagonists. But that "NO" helped write the end of an era of illusion.

  • The illusion that Grexit was a bluff, a terrifying device of memorandum propaganda. Until the prime minister found it on his desk, printed on an official Eurogroup document.
  • The illusion that we have alternative solutions. Until the prime minister discovered that in action the only alternatives were disorderly, catastrophic bankruptcy or 'the Schäuble alternative': Orderly bankruptcy and an assisted exit from the euro, which would make Greece a nation doubly subordinate to the lenders of the country, since their loans (and hence their even tougher memorandums) would be needed to survive and, moreover, would have it be expelled from all their clubs. It would be a country with heavier obligations, but without any rights.
  • The illusion that the country's bankruptcy had not taken place, that there are hidden funds somewhere, riches, treasures, hydrocarbons, which the "traitors" hide from the people to facilitate allegiance to foreigners. The latest version of this beautiful myth: The idea of "drachma supporters" having invaded the reserves of the Bank of Greece is so self-evidently ludicrous that it finally ridiculed the whole mythological structure.
  • The illusion, finally, that redemption is possible through the parallel currency and, ultimately, the drachma. Alexis Tsipras could be certain, and assure us that the introduction of it would mean a steep dip into extreme poverty for the socially weak (whom the Left should represent) and an equally abrupt multiplication of wealth and power for those who were able to insure their funds in distant paradises with "hard currency," only to return later to buy us at a discount. The perfect Leftist project...

The economic price was heavy, the political price deeply traumatic, but the result can be liberating. A late onset adulthood. Into which, let even his sworn enemies admit it, Alexis Tsipras could lead us. Because, of those illusions of ours, no one could free us but someone who genuinely shared in them, since, as Marx wrote, no one can create a massive illusion if he himself is not the first victim of it. There remains, of course, the question if it is he who could lead a country traumatically freed of its illusions fully to the catharsis of this drama: overcoming the crisis itself. But that remains to be seen.

This post originally appeared on HuffPost Greece and was translated into English.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot