The Blog

Harriet Miers and the Theater of the Absurd

Opposition to this nomination is reaching a critical mass; it's time for Miers to withdraw. She seems a perfectly decent, albeit grossly sycophantic, woman.
|
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Here's an inadvertently hilarious paragraph from a story about the Miers' nomination by Charles Savage in the Boston Globe :

"WASHINGTON -- Some of the advocacy groups that are concerned about Supreme Court nominee Harriet E. Miers's lack of a record on social issues are favoring a new approach to thwarting her nomination: Asking the nominee, who has no judicial experience, complex questions about constitutional law...."

Imagine! Asking a nominee to the Supreme Court complex questions about constitutional law. The nerve.

I can't resist quoting the next paragraph:

"''We are trying to establish that there are thousands of questions that law students routinely deal with . . . and if she can't get to that level, it doesn't matter if you're for the left or the right, at that point it's a fait accompli that she is not fit for the office,' said Eugene DelGaudio, president of Public Advocate, a conservative profamily group."

Note that DelGaudio is from a conservative group....

Opposition to this nomination is reaching a critical mass; it's time for Miers to withdraw. She seems a perfectly decent, albeit grossly sycophantic, woman. She should get out while she still has some shred of a reputation intact. Otherwise, these angry, jilted conservatives are going to claw her to pieces.

There is one other possibility: that Miers' opponents have set the bar so low (surely the White House counsel can handle questions routinely debated by law students...right?) that she will benefit from excessively lowered expectations. I mean, she shows no signs of being a total idiot....

Before You Go

Popular in the Community