Collusion might reasonably be defined as meeting the enemy and discovering it is both them and us. In the case of health -- personal well-being and public health alike -- exactly this sort of thing is going on. It is way past time to take the way past these toxic impasses.
Let's start with public health, and then get more personal. The leading public health problems of our time are obesity and related chronic diseases. This is well studied and thoroughly established. As bad as the current situation is, with chronic diseases imposing an enormous burden in both human and economic terms, things are projected to get far worse. Chronic diseases are proliferating around the globe, affecting ever more people here in the U.S. and taking hold at ever younger ages. We are losing an enormous number of years from our lives and an all but incalculable amount of life from our years.
What makes this truly tragic is that it is almost entirely preventable. We have known exactly what it takes to reduce the aggregate burden of chronic disease by fully 80 percent for literal decades. The relevant research is noteworthy for its power, clarity, consistency, and lack of controversy. Instead of staring down the barrel of a figurative gun at a future in which one in three of us is diabetic, we could readily be looking at a future in which 90 percent of all diabetes is eliminated outright. There are few forks in the road of life as flagrant as that.
But since we have known for decades that better use of our feet (physical activity), forks (dietary pattern), and fingers (not holding cigarettes) could transform public health, and have done relatively little with the information -- at least with regard to diet and physical activity -- we are squandering an incredible opportunity. We squander it by eating a diet in which nearly 50 percent of calories come from certifiable "junk," and in which we talk about the benefits of exercise and then go on displacing every former use of our muscles with schedules that preclude them, and new technologies that do them for us.
We could blame it all on the food companies that make the junk food, and the technology companies that keep inventing more ways for us to be sedentary. But as noted, the enemy is both them and us.
What's the collusion? We let their inventions become the mothers of our previously-unrecognized necessities. Nobody needed soft drinks before they were invented; thirsty people did just fine with water. But we sure seem to need them now, downing sugar measured in tonnage, an astronomical number of calories, and spending fortunes for the privilege of propagating our collective risk for obesity and diabetes. Rakes once seemed to suffice, but now a wayward leaf clearly demands the revving engine of a power blower. To say nothing of the need to play soccer on a screen using only our thumbs, while an actual soccer ball sits unused in the yard. You get the idea.
Nobody is making us stay on the couch or eat junk food -- they are just selling stuff we keep buying.
Yes, it is true that junk food is willfully engineered to be addictive, but so are illicit drugs -- and most of us choose not to use them in the first place. We have no fundamental obligation to call toaster pastries "breakfast," French fries a snack, or to keep runnin' on Dunkin. We do have choices.
When we complain that food companies should make better food -- and they should -- they counter that they make and sell what we buy and eat. It's a bit of judo and a bit of theater on their part, but it is also one part true. If we only bought better food, they would stop making junk pretty quick. If we want to transform our food supply into one that makes loving food that loves us back the norm, we can't just keep wagging a finger at Big, bad Food even as we stock up on their concoctions. We need to share a taste for change -- by showing we actually prefer to buy products that are good for us. A process of taste bud "rehab" is readily available to us all to set just a cascade in motion.
As for personal health, the story is much the same. An 80 percent reduction in the collective burden of chronic disease means that you, and I, have the means available to slash our personal risk of ALL major chronic disease -- heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes, dementia -- by that same 80 percent. It means that if knowledge were power, if we used what we have long known -- there are fully eight chances in 10 that our loved ones who have been diagnosed with any of the above, would not be. This is not about some remote, anonymous public. This is up close and very personal. It's all about us and the people we love.
But here, too, we tend to squander the opportunity. While knowing just what it takes to lose weight and find health, to add years to life and life to years, we turn again and again to lose-weight-fast diets and variations on the theme of false promises and magical thinking.
Here, we could blame the fad diet authors, hucksters, and other malefactors of the Military-Industrial establishment. But again, the enemy is both them and us.
What's the collusion? We could, any time we like, concede that quick fix diets cannot be a solution to the lifelong challenge of weight control. We could acknowledge that going on diets that leave our children behind in an age of epidemic childhood obesity is not only fraught with the likelihood of failure but is fundamentally irresponsible. Apparently, we are saying to our children: Grow up and get fat, then you, too, can try to sort it out for yourselves. As long as we keep buying lotions, potions, and fad diets, the individuals and industries involved will all too happily keep selling them.
What, then, is the way past the impasse? Pretty straightforward, actually:
1) Apply common sense more commonly
Reasonable, responsible people apply common sense to everything that matters -- money and mortgages; education and careers; pet care and vacation planning. And yet, we turn it off and go into some kind of "trance of gullibility" when promises about weight loss and health promotion come along. We could stop, and apply common sense more commonly to health -- which certainly belongs on the short list of priorities we all respect and take seriously.
2) Get real
We know that get-rich-quick schemes tend to be the stuff of sit-coms, not serious people. Serious people know that worthwhile things generally take time and some actual effort. We need to approach losing weight and finding health in the real world, not fantasyland.
3) Get empowered to be responsible
The Spiderman movies famously served up the adage, "With great power comes great responsibility." That implies a corollary we all too often ignore: Before we can take responsibility, we must be empowered. There is an empowering set of skills for getting to health in spite of it all that successful experts apply to themselves. Such skills can be acquired, and applied, by anyone willing to make the effort. Only those who were empowered with the skill of literacy can take responsibility for all the reading and writing we need to do throughout our lives; there can be no such responsibility in the absence of ability. There is health literacy, too. There is a skill set for getting to health. We can go and get it.
4) See the forest through the trees
We do not have epidemic obesity and chronic disease because of any one food, nutrient, ingredient, chemical, or device. We live in a perfect storm of obesigenic factors. Similarly, no active ingredient or silver bullet will fix everything. We are unlikely to get out of the woods until we see the relevant forest through the trees.
5) Take one step
The journey of a thousand miles famously begins with one step. The journey to health in most cases is substantially shorter than that but also begins with one step. Learn and apply a skill to sleep better, or manage stress, and you may find you have the energy to be more active. Be more active by applying skills to fit fitness in, and you may find you sleep better, or feel less stressed. Improve your stress, sleep, and activity level -- and you may suddenly find yourself prepared to start improving your diet. Do that, and you may find you feel better and want to get a bit more exercise. Rather than giving up foods you love, you could learn how to TRADE up foods you love to better choices in the same category -- better chips, for instance -- so that you keep loving the food, but the food starts loving you back. In the process, you could rehabilitate your taste buds so one choice at a time, you actually come to prefer foods that are better for you. We readily get caught up in a pattern where each thing that conspires against our health -- lack of sleep, excess stress, weight gain, poor eating, lack of exercise -- compounds the next, until the degenerating spiral takes our quality of life right down the drain. This process can be reverse engineered one step a time, so we are climbing a spiral staircase up to the health and vitality we want, and deserve.
We could, I suppose, just go with the status quo. We could all undergo more operations and take more drugs, like the statins we heard this week millions more of us need. We could let our kids get fatter and sicker at younger ages than we, and let them undergo ever more surgery and take more drugs, too. We could do that, at huge cost in both dollar and human terms.
But why would we? Lifestyle is more powerful medicine than anything ever developed by a pharmaceutical company, accessible to us all, stunningly free of side effects, safe enough for children and octogenarians alike, under our control, suitable for everyone every day, and requires no prescription. It is also the means to a truly luminous prize: a better life. That's what health is for -- it makes living better. We could add years to life, and life to years -- not only for ourselves, but for those we love as well. We could give this gift to our children and grandchildren.
It may seem as if what stops our progress to health is unfixable. Just the opposite is true. If we initiate the right process -- take one step on the way past the impasses -- then what would fix health could very well be: unstoppable.
Shall we get started?
Dr. David L. Katz; www.davidkatzmd.com