The instant news broke about the hideous bloodbath in Paris, the predictable happened. The tweets from the conservative echo chamber came fast and furious. They called for a total, all-out war, bashed immigrants, gun control advocates, liberals, the students at the University of Missouri, President Obama, lax security, permissiveness, and of course, Muslims.
At that point, not one of the attacker's identities had been confirmed, no motive was given for the attack, and no group had claimed responsibility for it. Even after ISIS purportedly claimed the bloodbath as its handiwork, officials had still not confirmed the truth of ISIS's claim. And countless Muslim organizations and Muslim-majority countries, including Iran, denounced the attack. It made no difference -- the brutal finger pointing was in full swing.
By contrast, Obama denounced the attack, and again called for greater vigilance and aggressiveness against terrorism. He did not say "Islamic terrorism." This set off the shrill conservative echo chamber even louder. But Obama's care in putting the blame and the action needed in the right place, and not on all Muslims or immigrants was the type of caution and restraint needed at a time when the witch-hunt against Muslims was again cranking up.
The right-wing's manic desire to turn every horrific and bloody terror attack into a political vendetta against immigrants and Muslims is a worn script. But it's a serviceable one. In part because there are just enough real, legitimate and bloody terror cells and individuals who are willing to commit mass murder and mayhem for their warped, crackpot, ideals.
The other part of the reason the right jumps on the anti-Muslim bandwagon when terror strikes is because it stokes, fans, and inflames anti-immigrant fear and hysteria. This has been a trump card for legions of GOP demagogic, fear-mongering officials and candidates. GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump is only the latest in the long line.
Even before the Paris massacre, there was evidence that immigrant and Muslim bashing would be back on the GOP political table. Trump milked it for maximum worth to garner headlines, massive media attention, and a poll ratings bonanza.
The Paris massacre has the potential and the danger to up the ante even more. This could spell danger for Democratic presidential contenders Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders. Sanders has called for big slashes in the defense budget and a drastic de-escalation in America's war making power in the Middle East.
Clinton hasn't gone that far, but has taken a cautious and restrained position on how and where America should make war. This includes her public pledge not to go to war with ISIS.
The Paris attack may change that. Certainly the pressure will be heavy on both Democratic presidential candidates and Obama to take an even harder line on the Middle East conflicts. It won't just be ISIS that will be the focal point of any stepped up American offensives. Muslim groups in this country could draw even greater scrutiny up to and including widening surveillance and monitoring.
When homegrown terrorist Timothy McVeigh blew up the Oklahoma City federal building in 1996, the predictable happened. By week's end, according to the Council on American-Islamic Relations, there were more than 200 acts of harassment and attacks against American Muslims, which included the burning of three Islamic mosques and community centers.
A full-blown domestic anti-Muslim witch-hunt was brewing. But then President Clinton and Attorney General Janet Reno did not rush to judgment and scapegoat Arabs. The swift arrest of McVeigh squelched the building mob hysteria against them.
President Bush, like Clinton, in his first public words after the terror attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon did not reflexively finger-point Arab terrorists. He took great pains to publicly rebuke the acts of harassment or violence against American Muslims and Sikhs in some cities. This likely did much to prevent wholesale acts of violence against Muslims.
This was also the case following the Boston Marathon bombing in 2013. Public anger and passions were running hot. Muslims were again under intense fire and the clamor was loud for a big crackdown. But Obama and then-Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick did not overreact. They damped down the furor and again made clear that the terror attack was the work of individuals and they would be the ones hunted down. And once they were apprehended their civil liberties and legal due process would be fully protected. Both were again careful not to give any hint that the heinous act had anything to do with Islam or the sentiment of Muslims in this country. They, in effect, played a reasoned, responsible, and decisive role in heading off any anti-immigrant or anti-Muslim backlash to the violent acts of a few.
The Paris massacre was shocking and horrific. It, as all terror attacks do, cause untold personal pain and suffering. But the truth is that the overwhelming majority of Muslims from war-torn countries are working hard to rebuild their shattered lives. They have been among the first to loudly denounce the despicable acts of those who sully Islam by committing abominable acts. The message again is, and must always be, hunt terrorists, not witch-hunt Muslims.
Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His latest book is What to Make of Ben Carson (Amazon Kindle). He is a frequent MSNBC contributor. He is an associate editor of New America Media. He is a weekly co-host of the Al Sharpton Show on Radio One. He is the host of the weekly Hutchinson Report on KPFK 90.7 FM Los Angeles and the Pacifica Network.