The next Presidential Debate on Sunday is a type of dreamy event for experts in Nonverbal Communication. This is the debate that the candidates are not tethered to the podium or saddled in a chair. Many experts will be talking about body language or how the candidates use their bodies to reinforce or contradict their message, or send a competing message all together. Sunday's debate will already favor Hillary Clinton, her performance and demeanor from the first debate is propelling her confidence but this is her turf. The Town Hall format is one her campaign has used and tested for many years, she has much experience in this arena.
Hillary Clinton thrives in this environment not only because she is prepared and better disciplined with her message and zings, Clinton does well surrounded by people because she is an excellent active listener. A rare communication skill found in politicians today, an important skill that adds voice and perspective to policy and message. A skill that also makes us uncomfortable because it violates personal characterizations we have come to expect of how politicians act and communicate. You can expect Hillary Clinton to walk closer to the person asking questions, removing physical distractions from her and the speaker. You might even see Hillary Clinton mirroring or complimenting the speaker with her body or facial expressions, often a natural occurring sign when we are engaged with the speaker.
Donald Trump on the other hand has a history of performing better tethered. Think of his reality TV show, his power was aided by sitting behind a large conference table. For Donald Trump a "win" will be somewhat easier for him, simply by beating expectations. And specifically Trump has one expectation that will help him "win", he needs to be conscience of Hillary Clinton's personal space and not invade that space. If he does, if he impedes that magical boundary he will offend more voters and the message that he is a bully will be reinforced, simply by getting too close to her. Trump needs to not appear aggressive.
One large advantage for Donald Trump is of course his inability to hide his facial expressions what he's feeling, this has added greatly to his "says what's on his mind" persona. Watch for much anger and pride, anger when Trump talks about America under the Obama administration and pride for what he has accomplished. These emotions comfort and ignite his base because the angry matches their own comforting their personal fear, while the pride motivates while offering hope.
Hillary Clinton on the other hand faces a large disconnect (pun intended). Clinton is often criticized for her controlled demeanor. Her facial expressions are less revealing about the emotions she is feeling, this has created doubt that her words are truthful. We as receivers of messages rely heavily on the nonverbal cues to understand and value the meaning of those messages. This is not to say Hillary Clinton is void of emotional display, but rather she has mastered control. In many ways I'd prefer to play poker with Trump.
This debate maybe the most important for the election. It could be a turning point for Trump, especially now that the expectations are so low off his first debate performance. Be ready for all of the "experts" to analyze what was said with no words.
The tip I would offer is use empathy while watching the debate, if you can place yourself in the candidates shoes that practice will reveal more to you about how the candidates feel more than the "experts' can.