If You Defend The U.S. Health Care System, Perhaps You’re Too Stupid To Live

If You Defend The U.S. Health Care System, Perhaps You’re Too Stupid To Live
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
<p>Roadside Gravestone</p>
Pat LaMarche

Roadside Gravestone

Lack of critical thinking: it’s killing us. And if you get alarmed by the headline of a May 22 Sacramento Bee article, it will continue killing us.

One of the few reasonable opinions President Trump expressed recently – in the face of stark ridicule – is that health care reform shouldn’t be that difficult. “Nobody knew,” he quipped.

I like boiling the health care discussion down to very few words – four in fact – live longer, pay less. When looked at with those four words in mind, the answer changes.

Nobody knew? Well some folks do.

Just look at whom lives longer and pays less. Why the Canadians, the Brits, the French, the Dutch, the Japanese, the Swiss, the Danes, the Italians, the South Koreans, the Israelis… They knew.

I could go on and on, but I don’t need to. ‘Cause if you’re still reading this and you favor our system of paying more and dying sooner, well forgive me, but perhaps you’re just too stupid to live.

And if the U.S. health care system only caused the untimely and early demise of stupid people – like Paul Ryan – who prefer a profit drenched system, then it might be okay. But you and I pay for Speaker Ryan to have some of the best health insurance in the country, so no, it’s not working out that way.

Back to the article in the Sacramento Bee – and I’m not blaming the reporter because her editor likely wrote the headline, which reads, “The price tag on universal health care is in, and it’s bigger than California’s budget,” and while technically true, it’s still less then the price tag on our current system. And in the case of California’s newly proposed universal health care plan, everyone is covered.

“The price tag on universal health care is in, and it’s bigger than California’s budget” is like saying, the price of a family’s new car is in, and it’s more than the grocery budget. It’s just erroneous math compounded with irrelevance.

See, using their comparison, the newspaper infers an outrageous price for universal health care but doesn’t adequately mention the savings from scrapping the current for profit insurance system. When you read the article written by Angela Hart, you see that she did look into savings. She even accounted for $100 to $150 billion that employers pay in right now. Her article is far more scholarly than the scare-tactic headline implies. But she says the accounting still falls $50 billion short overall. That’s because there’s no mention of out-of-pocket cash payments (or those foisted onto overburdened credit cards) that also go to pay for our current for-profit system.

So lets do this differently.

Right now, Hart’s article says that the cost of California’s proposed single payer system would be $400 billion. But using statistical information released in 2016, the U.S. spends – on average - $10,345 per person for health care – and that’s counting the people who don’t even get it. California has – as of 2015 – 39.14 million people. The total cost for the current system is $404.903 billion. That’s nearly $5 billion more that Californians pay to – you guessed it – die sooner.

$5 billion that could be better spent teaching headline writers logic and math.

Do you have info to share with HuffPost reporters? Here’s how.

Go to Homepage

MORE IN Wellness