Interview: Steven Soderbergh talks about <i>The Informant!</i>

Twenty years after he burst onto the scene, Steven Soderbergh considers what's changed in the intervening decades, and his upcoming film,
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Twenty years after he burst onto the scene with Sex, Lies and Videotape, Steven Soderbergh, dressed in black casual clothes, sits back on a couch in a Toronto hotel and considers what's changed in the intervening decades.

"I don't feel that different, really -- but then I don't feel different from when I graduated from high school," Soderbergh, 46, says. "I know more about my job now, by virtue of having practiced. I'd say the only thing I know now for sure is that people don't change. For a while, I labored under the illusion that people did change or that you could change them. I let go of that fantasy, which was a healthy thing to do. I've realized that they can change, but they have to do it on their own. They have to want to."

Soderbergh was in Toronto for the premiere of his film, The Informant!, opening Friday. Based on a true story, the film stars a toupeed, overweight Matt Damon as Mark Whitacre, a real-life whistle-blower who helped the government bring a major price-fixing case against agricultural giant Archer Daniels Midland -- before being caught himself for embezzling from ADM.

It's a studio picture, but hardly a mainstream movie. Whitacre is an oddball central character who's never quite trustworthy -- and Soderbergh emphasizes this with a voice-over narration that frequently digresses into Whitacre's random musings about whatever comes to his mind, often in the middle of a scene.

"Traditionally, voiceover is there to hold your hand," Soderbergh says. "But this is misdirection. It was (screenwriter Scott Burns') idea to have the narration bear no relation to what you're looking at, so that it didn't help explain things. I was very taken with that.

"Tangentiality is an aspect of bipolar behavior that's the most common. What's fascinating is how closely it mimics Mark's own thought process. What gives it the spin in the film is the placement, the fact that it happens in the middle of scenes in which he's talking about something else."

The film's music is also hilariously disconcerting. Marvin Hamlisch's score seems pulled from a 1970s' sitcom, though most of the film is set in the 1990s. Again, Soderbergh says, it was a specific choice he made, based on the character.

"I wanted the music from a '70s TV show," he says. "It had to function as his soundtrack, his music for his movie of himself. It's not meant for the audience. For me, it doesn't function in the way that a score does traditionally, which is as a path for the audience into the movie. If you take the music and the voice-over away, the performances are pitched in a natural way because I knew we would have other layers. It's crucial that we experience his emotional state musically -- and the voice-over gives you the mental landscape."

Where Erin Brockovich cast a corporation as a villain in a David-Goliath story, The Informant! only superficially explores ADM's massive misdeeds (for which the government fined it hundreds of millions of dollars and sent its executives to prison). Instead, this is Mark Whitacre's story, as told from his extremely skewed perspective.

"His character is what got me into to it," Soderbergh says. "I didn't see it as a movie about corporate crime or price-fixing. My sense was that he would be this guy no matter where he worked. This place was just a terrarium for bipolar behavior, combined with his own ambition."

The Informant! is decidedly unconventional, a major release that goes willfully against the grain. But Soderbergh had few problems convincing Warner Bros. to let him follow his instincts about how to portray Whitacre's odd little world.

"The studio was willing to believe in me," he says. "When they saw the film and realized I was telling the truth and making a comedy, they were relieved. They saw the dailies and were not seeing that. It's not an expensive movie, but they were taking a chance."

Taking a chance: That's something Sony Pictures ultimately was unwilling to do with Soderbergh early this past summer.

For the rest of this interview, click HERE to reach my website:

Popular in the Community