Kenyan Withdrawal From International Court Of Justice Slammed By Churches

Holland, Den Haag, Vredespaleis, home to the International Court of Justice.
Holland, Den Haag, Vredespaleis, home to the International Court of Justice.

NAIROBI, Kenya (RNS) With Kenya’s president and his deputy facing trials at the International Court of Justice in the Netherlands, parliamentarians here have voted to withdraw the country from the court.

But the Roman Catholic Church and the National Council of Churches of Kenya view the move as “misguided.”

Catholic Archbishop Zacchaeus Okoth, head of the bishops’ Justice and Peace Commission, said the church fears the withdrawal will breed impunity and injure human-rights protections.

“We urge our MPs to desist from passing motions that would inflict grave harm on the country’s present and future,” Okoth told a news conference in Nairobi on Sept. 10, the day the trial opened for the president’s deputy, William Ruto.

President Uhuru Kenyatta’s trial begins Nov. 12. The two leaders face charges of crimes against humanity following the violence that erupted after the 2007-08 elections. More than 1,300 people died and about 650,000 were displaced during the violence.

“The government must cooperate fully with the court to enable it to complete its process,” said Okoth.

Earlier, Crispus Yankem, communication manager for the National Council of Churches of Kenya, said his group’s support for the court had not changed. In 2009, the council dispatched a petition signed by one million people urging the courts to investigate Kenya.

The country’s evangelical churches and the Supreme Council of Kenya Muslims back the withdrawal.

Sheikh Adan Wachu, general secretary of the Supreme Council, said local courts should try the leaders, since Kenya is a sovereign state.

“We thought the court will deliver justice,” said the Rev. Wellington Mutiso, head of Kenya’s Baptist churches. “We feel it has since been politicized.”



Most To Least Religious Countries of 2013