This is the second in my series of "Letters to a Trump Supporter," from correspondence with a family friend who supports Mr. Trump.
In keeping with the immigration theme, he sent me a video of Bill Clinton, as president, vowing to increase deportations. I responded:
Yes, President Clinton said that, and his administration did conduct a lot of deportations. But you know who ordered more deportations than any other president? Barack Obama.
Anyone who tells you that today's Democratic Party is trying to encourage undocumented immigration is lying to you. The Democrats just don't engage in race-baiting and fear-mongering, so they don't get the headlines.
To this, my friend asked, "Do you agree to limit the number coming or agree to increase as Hillary wants?"
Below is my response.
Dear Mr. ----,
Good question, but I might need to clarify it a bit.
Hillary Clinton has never said that she wants to increase the number of immigrants coming into the United States without limit. Her website lists her immigration proposals, which don't say anything about an unlimited increase in immigration.
Current immigration law does have annual limits, and Secretary Clinton has not proposed to change them.
There are a couple things you might be referring to.
She has said that she wants to allow 65,000 Syrian refugees into the country. This would be a one-time increase representing 0.02% of the American population. That is a cap, of course, and a very small one at that.
She has also said that she would give undocumented immigrants a pathway to citizenship, but that's only for people who have already immigrated here. So it wouldn't change the number of immigrants at all.
This is not a particularly liberal stance. In fact, the leaders of both parties supported a pathway to citizenship in 2013 when they tried to pass immigration reform.
The Pulitzer Prize-winning news outlet ProPublica recently published a fascinating behind-the-scenes investigation into the failure of that effort. The Senate had passed a bill. The House was negotiating a bill. They had gotten 140 Republicans onboard. They were literally celebrating that a majority of both parties were ready to vote yes...and then Eric Cantor, the number-two Republican in power, was defeated in the primary by a conservative challenger who campaigned against his support for immigration reform. The Republican reformers all realized they were in danger of losing their seat too, so they abandoned the negotiation and the bill died.
If extremists like Donald Trump had not been allowed to hijack the debate, we probably would have passed immigration reform.
It even had the support of Sean Hannity, who said, "It's simple to me to fix it. If people are here, law-abiding, participating for years, their kids are born here, you know, first secure the border, pathway to citizenship, done."
And Paul Ryan, who said, "I want to do it because it's the right thing to do, because I'm Catholic, and my Christian values say we cannot have millions of people in second-tier status."
So, yes, to answer your question, I agree with Sean Hannity, I agree with Paul Ryan, and I agree with Hillary Clinton. Mass deportation is cruel and infeasible. A pathway to citizenship is in keeping with American values, Christian values, and common sense.