Looking into the Future: Iran and the United States beyond the P5+1

The news out of Vienna this week was positive. The P5+1 and Iran have agreed to a road map which would rein in Iran's nuclear program. The United States will try to limit Iran's nuclear infrastructure from centrifuges to enrichment facilities. Iran will push back. Much has been written about the economic benefit Iran will get if it agrees to compromise. Less attention, however, has been paid to the economic benefits the United States will reap from a nuclear deal.

The Shah of Iran dreamed of turning Iran into the Japan of West Asia. But war, revolution, radicalism and sanctions shattered those dreams. If Tehran agrees to a nuclear compromise, it can get out of the economic "penalty box," with clear long term benefits for its economy. Iran could emerge as a "mini" China or India. Its tremendous economic potential can finally be tapped.

But America too will win from this scenario in ways few have imagined. A strong Iranian economy - once it has moderated its policies and compromised on the nuclear issue - can become the largest consumer of American goods and services in the Middle East. For 35 years policy makers in US have been preoccupied with how to confront and contain Iran militarily and politically. Billions have been spent on sophisticated weaponry and alliances have been formed with unsavory regimes all the while abandoning America's greatest asset - its soft power through trade and investment.

70% of Iran's population is below the age of 35. Polling in Iran is difficult but a 2009 poll conducted by World Public Opinion held that 51% of Iranians hold a favorable view of America. This could translate into tremendous economic advantage for American companies should they be allowed to conduct business in Iran. The sanctions imposed on Iran's energy sector have prevented US oil companies, the world leaders in cutting edge technology for oil and gas extraction from entering a market that holds the second largest oil and gas reserves in the world. Before the 1979 Revolution Iran was producing six million barrels of oil a day at it's speak. Today because of mismanagement, cronyisms and sanctions it produces less the four million barrels.

Recently, the new Iranian oil minister has signaled to western oil companies that Iran was prepared to do away with its buy-back contracts in an effort to attract foreign investment and increase recovery rates of existing oil fields. A more balanced fiscal regime that allows oil companies to book reserves under a production sharing agreements would make it compelling for exploration and production giants like Exxon Mobile and Chevron to enter the Iranian market.

The manufacturing belt of the Midwest and the Pacific Northwest -- which boast such American companies like Boeing and Caterpillar -- will be huge recipients of purchase orders coming from Iran. An Iran that is able to buy American goods and services directly from American companies could eventually become the US largest trading partner in the Middle East. A population of 80 million people who would like nothing more than to purchase Apple and Microsoft products unimpeded. An Iran that sees the benefit of American trade and prosperity, that raises the standard of living for its people, could have far different foreign and domestic policy a decade from now than it does today.

Over the last 35 years successive administrations from Jimmy Carter to Barack Obama have sanctioned most American companies from participating in commercial activity in Iran. Over the last 4 years the Europeans have joined in on crippling banking sanctions that have made it very difficult for Iranian end users to pay for EU goods and services. This has been a boon for Indian, Russian and Chinese firms that have managed to flood the Iranian market with cheap and inferior goods. Iranians, if given a choice between American heavy industry and consumer products would chose them over their Russian or Asian counterparts.

Is there an example in recent history where a country that was virulently anti-western with a leadership who consistently portrayed the United States as an imperial power hell bent on seeking global domination moderated its policies and its rhetoric because it saw the benefits of economic prosperity tied to its relationship to the United States? Well yes- a big one: China. After 40 years of economic growth tied to foreign trade and investment with the United States the China of today is driven more by its commercial interests and less by the ideological rhetoric of the founders of the Peoples Republic.

Engaging Iran economically could be as beneficial for the United States economy and long term strategic vision for Middle East as it would be for Iran. Over time sustained economic investment and trade can overcome years of distrust and enmity.

Amir Handjani is an energy lawyer living and working in the U.A.E. and New York. He is a Senior Adviser to Karv Communications, a strategic communications firm with a focus on corporate communications, crisis management, and public affairs.