'Man Of Steel' Ending: Christopher Nolan Wasn't Sold On Superman Denouement At First

Why Christopher Nolan Wasn't Sold On The 'Man Of Steel' Ending

Warning: Spoilers about the end of "Man of Steel" ahead.

Many Superman fans were upset that the last son of Krypton kills General Zod at the end of "Man of Steel," and executive producer Christopher Nolan feels their pain. As it turns out, Nolan was also against the out-of-character turn for Superman, before being convinced otherwise by screenwriter David S. Goyer.

Here's Goyer discussing the end of "Man of Steel" with Empire magazine:

One of the lessons that Chris and I learned from Batman was that if you're going to revitalize an iconic figure like that, you have to be prepared to slay some sacred cows and you have to be prepared to weather the slings and arrows of some people. You have to respect the canon, but constantly question the canon. If you don't reinvent these characters -- and they are constantly being reinvented in the comic books -- then they become stagnant and they cease being relevant. We were feeling -- and I think a lot of people were feeling -- that Superman was ceasing to be relevant.


Killing Zod was a big thing and that was something that Chris Nolan originally said there's no way you can do this. That was a change. Originally, Zod got sucked into the Phantom Zone along with the others. I just felt it was unsatisfying and so did Zack. We started questioning and talked to some of the people at DC Comics and said, "Do you think there's ever a way that Superman would kill someone." At first they said, "No way. No way." We said, "But what if he didn't have a choice?" Originally, Chris didn't even want to let us try to write it. Zack and I said, "We think we can figure out a way that you'll buy it." I came up with this idea of the heat vision and these people about to die. I wrote the scene and I gave it to Chris and he said, "OK, you convinced me. I buy it."


I think it makes some people feel uncomfortable; other people say, "Right on." That was the point. Hopefully what we've done with the end of the film is we've gotten people -- the mainstream audience, not the geek audience -- to question [the character]. Hopefully we've redefined Superman.

For some, Goyer's redefinition of Superman was a bridge too far.

"I think this is the single most disturbing plot point in any blockbuster movie this summer. Disturbing, because I get the vibe that the filmmakers don’t even come close to understanding how crazy, how unexpected, how just plain wrong Superman killing someone is," Darren Franich wrote for EW.com, perhaps giving voice to the "geek audience" that Goyer was referring to in his quotes. "Having superpowers doesn’t give Superman the moral authority to decide who lives and who dies; if anything, it gives him less authority, since he has so much more absolute power to abuse absolutely. The crazy thing is that, in 'Man of Steel,' his power is exactly what gives him the authority."

Leave your own thoughts on this "Man of Steel" debate in the comments below. Listen to the Empire Magazine podcast, featuring Goyer, in the window above.

Henry Cavill

"Man Of Steel" Photos & Stills

Go To Homepage

Before You Go

Popular in the Community