The political and religious communities were set off last week by an article posted on The Atlantic that pointed out Michele Bachmann's former church, Salem Lutheran Church of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod, holds the Roman Catholic Pope to be the Antichrist. Joshua Green writes:
Bachmann was a longtime member of the Salem Evangelical Lutheran Church in Stillwater, Minn., which belongs to the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS), a council of churches founded in 1850 that today comprises about 400,000 people. WELS is the most conservative of the major Lutheran church organizations, known for its strict adherence to the writings of Martin Luther, the German theologian who broke with the Catholic Church and launched the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century. This includes endorsing Luther's statements about the papacy.
Daniel Burke pointed out that Bachmann, who formally quit the church in June, had publicly distanced herself from anti-Catholic views in a 2006 debate.
Today, the Rev. Mark Schroeder, president of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS) issued a response through the Religion News Service, hoping to clear up the controversy and speculation about the denomination's beliefs. He firmly states that, "To accuse (Bachmann) -- or her former church -- of being anti-Catholic is patently unfair and wrong," while also explaining that, "WELS holds to the historic Lutheran position that the Roman Catholic papacy fits the biblical characteristics of the Antichrist."
The full text of Rev. Schroeder's op-ed:
By Rev. Mark Schroeder
Religion News Service
MILWAUKEE (RNS) Recent news reports have thrust the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS) into the middle of a presidential campaign. What has catapulted this relatively small Lutheran church body into the media spotlight is the fact that, until recently, presidential candidate Michele Bachmann held membership in a WELS congregation.
As often happens in religious or political controversies, people tend to view issues through the prism of their own perspectives and beliefs. That, in turn, often results in obscured facts and distortions of the truth.
And that's exactly what happened in the discussion of our denomination's position on the Antichrist.
With 390,000 members, WELS is the third largest of the Lutheran churches in the United States. It is often described, properly so, as the "most theologically conservative" of the three.
WELS holds to the historic Lutheran position that the Roman Catholic papacy fits the biblical characteristics of the Antichrist. We do this without reservation and without apology. We believe that our doctrines cannot be tempered by political correctness or modified to align with changing culture or public opinion.
WELS draws all of its teachings from the Bible. "By Scripture alone" was one of the major themes of the Lutheran Reformation, and WELS has not retreated from that core belief.
Ours is also a "confessional" Lutheran church, which means that we hold to the teachings of the Lutheran Confessions because they are a clear and accurate articulation of biblical truth. These Reformation-era confessional writings identified the fundamental ways in which the Catholic Church had departed from the teachings of the Bible.
Even though Martin Luther had sought only to reform his church and return it to the correct teachings of Scripture, he was excommunicated by Rome and targeted for death. The birth of the Lutheran church was not Luther's preference; it was made necessary by the decisions of the Catholic Church itself.
Luther and the Lutheran Confessions identified the papacy as the Antichrist for three main reasons:
-- First, the papacy claimed to speak with an authority -- even infallibility -- that was equal to or surpassing the Word of God itself. By doing so, it put itself in a position of being "anti" or "in place of" Christ.
-- Second, the papacy claimed there is no salvation outside of the Catholic Church, making membership in a human organization a condition for salvation.
-- Third, in emphasizing that faith and obedience are necessary for salvation, the papacy undermined the very heart of the biblical teaching that salvation is by God's grace alone and comes to individuals through faith in Christ alone.
In each of these teachings, the papacy placed itself in clear opposition to the foundation of the Christian faith, and therefore in opposition to Christ himself. Although the Catholic Church may have softened the way in which it refers to these doctrines, it has never repudiated or corrected them.
While our church continues to see the characteristics of the Antichrist in the papacy, it is wrong and dishonest to portray this belief as stemming from anti-Catholic bigotry. Yes, we have strong convictions and we identify what we believe are teachings that depart from the Word of God. But we hold no animosity toward Christians of the Catholic faith, and we respect the right of people to hold beliefs different from ours even as we point out the error.
Furthermore, we rejoice that even in the Catholic Church (where we believe the gospel has been distorted) there are many Catholics who hold to a simple faith in Jesus Christ as their savior and who will ultimately be saved.
Testifying to the errors that still exist in Catholic doctrine is itself an expression of love; remaining silent or glossing over doctrinal differences would express the opposite.
Media reports have portrayed our position on the Antichrist to be a prominent or even signature doctrine in our church. Certainly we do not deny this teaching or attempt to hide it. At the same time, it is not a topic of daily discussion, or a regular theme in Sunday sermons.
This is not a view peculiar to WELS; it has been the historic position of the Lutheran church for almost 500 years -- a position still held by confessional Lutheran church bodies around the world.
Michele Bachmann is no longer a member of our church, and we are not in any position to comment on her current religious views. But we can say that her previous membership in our church does not make her guilty of being an "anti-Catholic bigot."
To accuse her -- or her former church -- of being anti-Catholic is patently unfair and wrong.
What do you think? Did Rev. Schroeder do Bachmann any favors with this explanation?