Worrisome Change to the <i>New York Times</i>' Ability to Cover Climate

This past week, theannounced the closure of their environmental desk. Newspapers generally are under economic stress, and unfortunately, theis also affected. Its role in informing U.S. policy debates, however, is unique.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
NEW YORK - FEBRUARY 19: The New York Times headquarters is seen February 19, 2009 in New York City. The New York Times Co. suspended quarterly dividend payments to shareholders today in an effort to reduce debt. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)
NEW YORK - FEBRUARY 19: The New York Times headquarters is seen February 19, 2009 in New York City. The New York Times Co. suspended quarterly dividend payments to shareholders today in an effort to reduce debt. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)

This past week, the New York Times announced the closure of their environmental desk. Along with many, I am sorry to see this team disbanded; over the last several years they have consistently provided high-quality reporting on critical environmental issues, especially the climate crisis. Newspapers generally are under economic stress, and unfortunately, the Times is also profoundly affected by the tectonic shifts in the media landscape. Its role in informing U.S. policy debates, however, is unique.

While I am sad to see this dedicated desk come to an end, I hope that its tremendous reporters can, as the newspaper's leadership promised, continue their crucial work and can help influence the general newsroom by incorporating important environmental perspectives throughout the paper.

Cross-posted from Al's Journal

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot