NO, The Ni'ihau Incident Did NOT Lead To FDR Signing EO9066

NO, The Ni'ihau Incident Did NOT Lead To FDR Signing EO9066
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
A comparison of lead actor and Benehakaka Kanahele, the man he is portraying. The resemblance is lacking, to say the least.

A comparison of lead actor and Benehakaka Kanahele, the man he is portraying. The resemblance is lacking, to say the least.

Via Shutterstock and Hawaii Reporter

According to Deadline on May 9, 2017, Zach McGowan has been chosen to star in a film titled “Ni’ihau,” directed by Gabriel Robertson and taking place in Hawaii during World War II. He will be portraying Benehakaka Kanahele, a native Hawaiian who received the Medal for Merit and Purple Heart for his part in subduing the pilot of a downed Imperial Japanese plane in the aftermath of the attack on Pearl Harbor.

You’ll probably notice that Zach McGowan doesn’t bear much of a resemblance to Kanahele, and it’s even more of a stretch than casting Emma Stone as part Hawaiian. Once again, members of the API community will watch as they are portrayed in media by white replacements. At this point, we are frustrated, but hardly surprised when this happens. But let’s also remember that Asians in the U.S. and Pacific Islanders have faced very different struggles throughout U.S. history, and we must be able to stand up for both communities. Pacific Islanders have been abused and discriminated against throughout the U.S.’s history, and this appears to be just another manifestation of that shameful legacy.

I would like to emphasize however, that I think some people are missing the point.

What is most disturbing here is the historical denialism bubbling up from under the surface of this story.

Take a look at this quotation from the Deadline article:

The Ni’ihau Incident led to President Franklin D Roosevelt issuing Executive Order 9066, which directly led to the mass internment of 119,803 Japanese-American men, women and children until the end of the war. The film is about the incident itself, which was seen to be the catalyst of fear that spurred Roosevelt’s decree. In 1976, President Gerald Ford rescinded Executive Order 9066.

Here is an equally erroneous quotation from Variety magazine:

The incident also prompted President Franklin D. Roosevelt to issue an executive order placing thousands of Japanese-Americans in internment camps, widely regarded as one of the darkest hours in U.S. history.

First, I want to emphasize that this is not a personal attack on the authors. We have to look critically at all statements about our history if we want to avoid repeating the mistakes of our past. The Ni’ihau Incident merits discussion, but it cannot be seen as the “catalyst” that led to the unjust incarceration of 120,000 Japanese Americans.

Here is the problem with the above statement. Yes, the Ni’ihau Incident occurred, where a Japanese immigrant provided assistance to a downed pilot for the Imperial Japanese air force. However, the above quotation is inherently discounting the decades and decades of anti-Asian racism and institutionalized discrimination that influenced FDR, the state governors, congress, and local governments to create and implement Executive Order 9066 and its subsequent legal enforcement mechanisms.

Remember that in 1922 Takao Ozawa v. United States, the Supreme Court used racial pseudoscience to decide that white meant Caucasian (in reality Western European), and thus Ozawa could be barred from naturalized citizenship, since the Naturalization Act of 1870 limited this to whites, as well as ”aliens of African nativity and to persons of African descent.”

After this, there were the alien land laws that barred Asian immigrants from owning land (using the above SCOTUS decision), since many local whites wanted to use legal means to take away the land that immigrants had worked so hard to cultivate. The 1924 immigration act that banned Asian and Middle Eastern immigrants altogether, leaving many families separated, and feeling betrayed by the country they had come to call home.

Numerous hate groups sprung up along the West Coast that tried to demonize all people of Japanese descent. The Southern California Committee of One Thousand infamously said, “They exist like the yellowed butts in an over-full ashtray, vilifying the air with their loathsome smells...”

This is all compounded by the blatant racial bias that infected military and political leadership. General DeWitt, who was in charge of the Western Defense Command, said that “the Japanese are an enemy race”, and that “a Jap’s a Jap. It makes no difference whether the Jap is a citizen or not.”

Around this time, the Governor of Wyoming even threatened genocide in his state, saying that if people of Japanese descent were in his state unguarded during the war, there would be “Japs hanging from every pine tree.”

If you want to realize how normalized anti-Japanese discrimination was at the time, look at this cartoon that came out around that time, and note the artist’s name in the corner.

Note the artist’s name in the corner. No Japanese Americans were ever convicted of espionage during WWII, and all rumors of a “5th Column” were thoroughly debunked.

Note the artist’s name in the corner. No Japanese Americans were ever convicted of espionage during WWII, and all rumors of a “5th Column” were thoroughly debunked.

via Densho

Yes, the Ni’ihau Incident is a part of history, and should not be dismissed or suppressed for any reason. However, historians for the military, academics, the government and others have all concluded that this incident was in no way the catalyst that led to Executive Order 9066. Personal Justice Denied, the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians (CWRIC)’s 467-page report on Japanese American incarceration, concluded that EO9066 and the subsequent unjust imprisonment of around 120,000 citizens and their families were the result of “race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership.” We have to remember that it was the widespread normalization of racial prejudice that made our society so willing to accept such a gross violation of the civil liberties of its citizens and their families.

The article might have just been written poorly, and it is not clear whether or not this is a definite statement about the film’s content and angle, but what is clear is that Asian Americans must take control of our history, and make sure that it is not exploited or abused, whether it is simply for a profit (although signs show that whitewashing isn’t even that profitable at this point), or to push a more dangerous political agenda that uses immigrants as scapegoats.

We have to push back against a denialist narrative that demonizes immigrant families not just of Asian ancestry, but of all backgrounds. If it could happen to Japanese Americans back then, it could happen to any vulnerable population, and we are seeing a dangerous resurgence of this in modern times against our friends in the Muslim and Latinx communities, among others.

We have to make it clear that we will not allow anyone, politician, director, or otherwise, to distort our history for their own gain. We must own our history.

Before You Go


Popular in the Community


What's Hot