That claim is now being called into question after multiple mediaoutlets surfaced a March 2011 letter from the prince’s former private secretary, Alastair Watson, saying that the royal and Epstein were first introduced in “the early 1990s.” At the time, Watson also denied any “insinuations and innuendos” about Andrew.
Advertisement
That directly contradicts the prince’s comment on Saturday, when he said that the two “met through his [Epstein’s] girlfriend back in 1999.”
In a comment to HuffPost by email on Tuesday, Buckingham Palace said, “The Duke’s words in his interview speak for themselves.”
The palace did not comment on the “speculation” that the prince is contemplating a second TV interview about his relationship with Epstein after his catastrophic first attempt over the weekend.
Advertisement
A royal source told Vanity Fair in an article published Tuesday that there were “rumors swirling that Andrew wants to do another interview.”
“Andrew hasn’t drawn a line under it,” the unnamed source told the outlet. “He wants the chance to put right the things he didn’t say. ‘Newsnight’ gave him the chance to show some remorse. He was asked if there was anything else he wanted to say. It was an open goal — he didn’t grasp it, and I think he sees that now.”
In the interview, Andrew was raked over the coals for not expressing enough remorse for Epstein’s victims and for denying that he ever met or had sexual relations with Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who has alleged that at age 17 she was raped by the prince. He has repeatedly denied having any kind of sexual relations with Giuffre.
The duke also gave bumbling answers to serious questions, like saying he was “too honorable” to decline to stay at Epstein’s house.
Advertisement
He also failed to condemn Epstein’s behavior in any sort of strongly worded terms when interviewer Emily Maitlis asked if the prince regretted his association with the financier.
“Do I regret that he [Epstein] has quite obviously conducted himself in a manner unbecoming? Yes,” the prince said.
“Unbecoming?” Maitlis fired back. “He was a sex offender.”
Since the interview, companies involved with Andrew’s Pitch@Palace program, which is meant to boost entrepreneurs, have seemingly distanced themselves from the royal. The logos of KPMG, AstraZeneca, Barclays, Cisco, Standard Chartered and Bosch have all disappeared from the supporters’ page of the website.
On Wednesday, the Duke of York announced in a statement that he was stepping back from public life as the fallout from his relationship with Epstein had “become a major disruption to my family’s work.”
“Therefore, I have asked Her Majesty if I may step back from public duties for the foreseeable future, and she has given her permission,” he said.
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you’ll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.