MSNBC host Rachel Maddow blasted CNN on Monday for disregarding its own previously announced debate qualifications to allow Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) to take the main stage in Tuesday night's GOP presidential debate in Las Vegas.
According to CNN's own guidelines, candidates would have to meet one of three criteria in order to be included on the main stage: a national polling average of at least 3.5 percent, an Iowa state polling average of at least 4 percent, or a New Hampshire state polling average of at least 4 percent. (The Iowa caucus and the New Hampshire primary are, of course, the opening salvos of the primary season.) The polling numbers would not be rounded, the network said.
Advertisement
The host of "The Rachel Maddow Show" said that Paul did not meet any of those criteria.
"He doesn't get a polling average of 4 percent or more in Iowa, even with the late-breaking Iowa Fox News poll," Maddow said. "But CNN -- I don't mean to be weird, but they have been, I hesitate to say lying, but they've been lying about this on their own air for a couple of days now, and I really don't understand why."
Maddow proceeded to show a few CNN clips in which the network repeatedly asserted that Paul had made it onto the main stage with a boost from a last-minute Fox News poll, which found the candidate at 5 percent in Iowa.
But 5 percent in one Iowa poll, Maddow said, wasn't enough to raise Paul's overall average in the state to the needed 4 percent. "I mean, CNN is not an off-the-rails, cockamamie news organization, but what they're doing here is so weird," she said.
The Washington Post wrote Monday that by CNN's criteria, Paul's Iowa average appeared to be 3.7 percent.
Advertisement
When asked for comment by The Huffington Post, CNN did not explain in detail how it made its decision about Paul. A network spokeswoman simply said in a statement, "In the light of new polling ... and in the spirit of being as inclusive as possible, CNN has decided to include Sen. Rand Paul in the prime time debate."
For purposes of calculating the candidates' polling averages, CNN had said it would look at live-interviewer surveys conducted between Oct. 29 and Dec. 13, including polls by CNN, Fox News, ABC, CBS, NBC, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, The Des Moines Register, Pew Research Center and Quinnipiac University.
Also on HuffPost:
Moments From The CNBC Republican Debate
Support HuffPost
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.
Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you’ll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.