The first challenge for the 14 artist-contestants on Work of Art, Bravo's new reality TV show that airs tonight at 11, is to paint a portrait of one of the other contestants...in 13 hours. I'll definitely tune in -- sorry Chelsea Lately -- to see what they come up with. In the Boston Globe, Sebastian Smee reports that the show poses questions that most people are afraid to ask:
It starts with the obvious ones: How do we judge art? Are artists like you and me, or are they different? Is success in the art world about vision and skill, is it about knowing how to sell yourself, or is it just a lottery? Even within the first episode, the questions get more nuanced. For instance: How on earth do you go about capturing someone's 'essence' (as opposed to their appearance) visually, in a portrait? Is it enough to be told that an artwork is underpinned by various ideas, or does the work itself need to express those ideas? And can the process of creating a work of art be as important as the finished product?
If the show helps inform and educate the general public about contemporary art issues and ongoing dialogues, that would be terrific. Let's just hope kids aren't encouraged to think being an artist is a practical career path. Aren't there already enough bitter, unemployed, middle-aged MFAs out there?
Judith Ann Braun
Jaime Lynn Henderson
Links courtesy of The Art Fag City "Work of Art" Supplementary Program Guide.
Art Reality: An Art21 post I wrote last year during the audition phase about the reality of being an artist.