Politicians like to trick us by hiding behind their spokespeople and then, if necessary, contradicting whatever their spokesperson said.
Case in point: Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Aurora)
Earlier this week, Coffman put out a wishy washy statement about whether he'd support Donald Trump.
But back in February, when Coffman himself was dodging reporters' questions about Trump, Coffman's spokesperson was adamant that Coffman would back Trump if Trump became the Republican nominee, as quoted by The Colorado Statesman's Ernest Luning.
Good reporters won't let a politician, like Coffman, shove out a new position without, at a minimum, explaining why the new statement contradicts that of his spokesperson.
Case in point: Denver 9News political reporter Brandon Rittiman.
He quoted Coffman's statement about Trump yesterday and noted that it completely contradicted the words of his mouthpiece back in February. From Rittiman's story:
In a statement, Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Colorado) said he's not sold on Trump yet, calling his party's presumptive presidential nominee "divisive."
"Trump has a long way to go to earn the support of many - me included," Coffman wrote.
That statement contradicts what his campaign told the Colorado Statesman in February. The relevant portion of the article (which is behind a paywall) reads as follows:
"Will Mike Coffman support the Republican nominee over Bernie or Hillary?" said [Mike Coffman] campaign spokeswoman Kristin Strohm. "The answer is obviously yes. And he believes strongly it is going to be Marco Rubio."
Other reporting on Coffman's Trump statement ignored Strohm's comment, but I'm sure there will be ample opportunities for reporters to ask Coffman to explain what's going on here.
