'Right-to-work' Drains Middle Class

WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 28:  The dome of the U.S. Capitol is seen on Capitol Hill August 28, 2012 in Washington, DC. It has b
WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 28: The dome of the U.S. Capitol is seen on Capitol Hill August 28, 2012 in Washington, DC. It has been reported that the dome has 1,300 known cracks and breaks leaking water to the interior of the Rotunda and needs restorations. The Senate Appropriations Committee has approved $61 million before the August recess to repair the structure. On Monday, Committee on Rules and Administration chairman Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) called on Speaker of the House Rep. John Boehner (R-OH) to support the repairs. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

I believe people enjoy the benefits that the labor movement has provided us: weekends, holidays, fair wages, and safe work environments. It is for that reason that I am firmly opposed to the Tea Party reform movement called "Right-to-Work." This so called reform spearheaded by fringe elements has led to the slashing of worker's rights and will decimate our middle class. "Right-to-work" legislation is Tea Party slang for destroying the rights of people to earn a decent wage and make a solid living.

"Right-to-work" laws can have devastating impacts on workers and a state's economy as a whole. For workers, these laws mean an erosion of their bargaining power, and that is for both public and private sector workers. It is an attempt to drain unions of funds necessary to fight for fair wages and good working conditions.

It also means diminished wages. According to the AFL-CIO, on average, workers in states with "right-to-work" laws are paid $5,538 less a year than workers in states without these laws. Moreover, these laws have been shown to actually benefit the wealthier classes at the expense of workers. A 2007 study by Hofstra found that "right-to-work" laws boost the number of businesses in a state... but the benefits went mostly to the business owners, while wages for average workers went down.

In addition, a 2010 study by the Kauffman Foundation ranked states on how well "the structure of state economies match the ideal structure of the New Economy." Nine of the top 10 states in the study did not have "right-to-work" laws, while eight of the bottom 10 states did have "right-to-work" laws. States with "right-to-work" laws also have a higher of work related fatalities than those without, 52.9 percent higher, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

New Jersey has already witnessed hard times for working people and working families. More people are living in poverty now than they were three years ago, and the middle class has shrunk. We rank second in the nation in foreclosures. We certainly can't afford to see "right-to-work" come to New Jersey, and it will never happen as long as I am Senate President.

The organized effort to protect workers rights, your rights, is one of the things that has made our country great. It is because of these efforts that we have a minimum wage, a 40-hour work week, and a safe, sanitary place to work. They are the reason a strong middle class is even possible in our country and in our state. We should be boosting the middle class and protecting working people. We should not be under cutting them. That's what "right-to-work" does, that is why I'll never support it, and that is why we have to fight against it here in New Jersey and across the country.