Image credit: Google
When to follow the rules and when to violate them? When to preserve beautiful order and when to flirt with anarchy?
A few years ago, my wife and I were readying ourselves for bed when the most horrifying sound came from our son's bedroom: the sound of a young child coughing and struggling to breathe. I arrived in his bedroom first, so I got first crack at failing to figure out what was going on and how to fix it. A morbid feeling of helplessness climbed up the back of my throat as I held my son; his mind was obviously racing to process the transition from peaceful sleep to now being awake and unable to breathe. After a minute or so of trying to calm him down to no avail, we called our neighbor to come sit with our still-somehow-sleeping daughter, jumped in the car, and raced off toward the Children's Hospital that was fortunately located nearby. (Thankfully, it turned out to be nothing more serious than a bad first case of croup.)
Several laws were broken during the course of that short drive: speed limits, car seat requirements (my wife held our frightened, gasping son in her lap), lane change regulations, stop sign commands. The law makes no exception for taking these actions in the event of an emergency. Here in Ohio, for example, if you are responding to an emergency in an official vehicle equipped with a flashing light visible from 500 feet away and an audible siren, the traffic laws largely don't apply to you. But, if you're a private citizen driving a Honda, the fact that you are responding to an emergency doesn't exempt you from the rules.
- If I had insisted my wife buckle our gasping son in his car seat the backseat instead of holding him tightly and giving him as much comfort through connection as possible?
- If I had obeyed the 25 mph limit in our neighborhood, coming to a complete standstill at every stop sign?
- If I had maintained the prescribed distance behind the car in front of me and signaled for the prescribed period of time before changing lanes?
What if the car in my garage that night had been a self-driving autonomous car?
It turns out that a major hurdle on the journey towards safer roads through autonomous cars is one unforseen, counterintuitive problem:
The self-driving car, that cutting-edge creation that's supposed to lead to a world without accidents, is achieving the exact opposite right now: The vehicles have racked up a crash rate double that of those with human drivers.
They obey the law all the time, as in, without exception. This may sound like the right way to program a robot to drive a car, but good luck trying to merge onto a chaotic, jam-packed highway with traffic flying along well above the speed limit. It tends not to work out well.
What does this have to do with leadership? Everything, if you intend to lead a group of people and expect them to think and solve the unforseeable problems that every organization encounters. It is easy to succumb to the fears and uncertainty from trusting people to know when to follow the rules, and when they should break them in order to achieve the more important mission of the organization. As a leader, who would argue with this concern?
"It's a sticky area. ... If you program them to not follow the law, how much do you let them break the law?"
And yet, to do otherwise is to give rule compliance precedence over mission completion, obedience over results.
In his book Leaders Eat Last, Simon Sinek relays the story of an FAA air traffic controller who chose to break the rules regarding airspace management in order to guide an airliner in distress down to the ground as quickly as possible. Nobody reading the story would argue this air traffic controller should have acted otherwise and blindly followed the rules. Yet, when it comes to our own people in our own teams, the question bedeviling the programmers of the Google Self-Driving Car project often screams the loudest: how much do you let them break the law?
The answer, says Sinek, is simple: as much as they need to in order to do the right thing ... and setting the environment up for that to occur is THE task of leadership:
The responsibility of a leader is to provide cover from above for their people who are working below. When the people feel that they have the control to do what's right, even if it sometimes means breaking the rules, then they will more likely do the right thing. Courage comes from above. Our confidence to do what's right is determined by how trusted we feel by our leaders.
If good people are asked to work in a bad culture, one in which leaders do not relinquish control, then the odds of something bad happening go up. People will be more concerned about following the rules out of fear of getting in trouble or losing their jobs than doing what needs to be done. And when that happens, souls will be lost.
Lead people who will break the rules at times as they focus on accomplishing something more important, or issue commands to automatons who will follow the rules no matter what. Creativity vs control: you choose.
Lance Salyers currently serves as a corporate executive after a first career as a prosecuting attorney. He blogs about the fundamentals of people-focused leadership at his website: Leading With IDEAS.