The Blog

In Support of Same-Sex Marriage

The Supreme Court should require the full recognition of same-sex marriage throughout this country. If the Court rules otherwise, whatever the legal logic, a clear injustice will result. And that injustice would damage the health and welfare of millions of Americans.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Edward W. Campion, M.D., Stephen Morrissey, Ph.D., and Jeffrey M. Drazen, M.D.

Eleven years ago, Massachusetts became the first state in the country to give same-sex marriages full legal recognition. Today, same-sex marriage is legal, through legislative or judicial action or by popular vote, in more than 35 states and the District of Columbia. It is recognized by the federal government. And polls consistently show that it is supported by a clear majority of Americans. However, in Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan, and Tennessee, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in favor of laws and constitutional amendments that define marriage as a union between a man and a woman only, denying recognition of same-sex marriage. Given the conflicting lower-court rulings, the Supreme Court has taken the issue under consideration. The Court will hear oral arguments on April 28 and is expected to hand down its ruling by the end of the current session, in June. We believe that the Court should resolve this conflict in favor of the full recognition of same-sex marriage throughout the United States.

A fundamental tenet of all medical care is the acceptance of patients as they are, for who they are, with respect and without prejudice or personal agendas. In most of the world, including the United States, there has been a long, sad history of mistreatment of homosexuals and misunderstanding of homosexuality, a normal expression of human sexuality. This mistreatment has ranged from disrespect to ridicule, from ostracizing to genocide. Medicine and psychiatry once saw homosexuality as deviant behavior and produced many baseless, foolish theories to explain it. [1] Until 1987, it was included (albeit increasingly less prominently) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, despite mounting evidence to the contrary. And there are still health care providers who offer ways to "treat" homosexuality as if it were an illness. Many of us in decades past have known people who felt they had no choice but to hide their homosexuality with false behaviors and sham marriages. [2] Too often physicians have seen the price that their patients have paid for society's lack of acceptance of homosexuality. Stigma and shame lead to stress, anxiety, dysfunctional behavior, depression, even suicide. For all of us, sexual identity is an essential part of who we are. Those who are homosexual in a society that cannot give acceptance and respect suffer a constant insult to identity and a constant barrier to a normal life.

In this country and in many parts of the world, things have been changing. We are seeing greater respect and acceptance of people regardless of their sexuality. However, we have also seen efforts to avoid acceptance. Just a few weeks ago, the governor of Indiana proudly signed legislation making it possible for people to discriminate against homosexuals if the discrimination was said to be supported by religious beliefs. Fortunately, public outrage persuaded the governor and the legislature to backpedal, claiming it was all a misunderstanding. They have now amended the law to provide explicit protection for sexual orientation.

Same-sex marriage should be accepted both as a matter of justice and as a measure that promotes health. [3] Marriage as an institution is about stable, long-term relationships, which we know encourage health, reduce the risk of some diseases, and promote healthy families. All health professionals know that in those with chronic and severe illness, care almost always relies in part on family. And when things get really difficult, as when life and death decisions need to be made, physicians know that talking with a patient's partner is not legally the same as working with a patient's spouse. Many same-sex couples are now raising children, and the health of those children demands that their parents have the full rights and protection of marriage. In our society, marriage is often essential to obtaining and keeping adequate health insurance coverage for both members of a couple and for their children. More than 1,000 federal benefits are conferred by marriage, among them access to family medical leave, Medicaid, and Veterans Affairs medical services. Some of those benefits, however, are in jeopardy for same-sex spouses in states that do not recognize their union. The current situation -- with same-sex marriages, including those in families with children, legally recognized in some states but not others -- makes no sense, and the harmful consequences for health are well documented.

The Supreme Court should require the full recognition of same-sex marriage throughout this country. If the Court rules otherwise, whatever the legal logic, a clear injustice will result. And that injustice would damage the health and welfare of millions of Americans.


1. Bayer R. Homosexuality and American psychiatry: the politics of diagnosis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987.

2. Monette P. Becoming a man: half a life story. New York: HarperCollins, 1992.

3. Gonzales G. Same-sex marriage -- a prescription for better health. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1373-1376