Social Security Does Not Add to the Debt

FILE - In this July 14, 2011 file photo, the U.S. flag flies next to the Capitol in Washington, as Congress and the Obama Adm
FILE - In this July 14, 2011 file photo, the U.S. flag flies next to the Capitol in Washington, as Congress and the Obama Administration continue work to raise the debt ceiling. Back in the summer of 2011, as a debt crisis loomed much like one does again today, Obama issued a clear threat to Republicans: Without an agreement to raise the nation’s borrowing limit, older Americans might not get their Social Security checks. He wasn’t the first to issue such a warning in the face of a debt fight between an administration and Congress. The federal government could run out of cash to pay all its bills in full as early as Feb. 15, according to one authoritative estimate, and congressional Republicans want significant spending cuts in exchange for raising the debt ceiling. Obama, forced to negotiate an increase in 2011, has vowed not to negotiate again. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Several Congressional Democrats have made claims about the relationship between the Social Security program and the nation's debt that are disputed. Senators Richard Durbin and Jeanne Shaheen and Representatives Xavier Becerra and Hank Johnson have asserted that Social Security has not contributed to the federal debt. Their claims have been labeled false, mostly false, or true, but false by a variety of fact checkers.

I like fact checkers; their work is usually serious, informative, and even-handed. However, in this case, I think the fact checkers have it wrong.

There is one point in favor of the fact checkers. The Social Security Trustees have noted that provisions of the payroll tax cut that was part of the economic stimulus estabilshed a temporary subsidy from the general fund to reimburse the Social Security program for the revenue lost due to the tax cut. It is doubtless true that this subsidy increased the debt and the deficit.

However, there is a larger issue going forward: How does government borrowing to finance cash shortfalls in the Social Security program influence the deficit and debt? The line of argument used consistently by fact checkers is that the Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance program (OASDI, popularly known as Social Security) is currently taking in less in revenue (from the FICA tax that finances the program) than it is paying out in benefits. This deficit must be financed by borrowing. For the fact checkers, this claim is dispositive: Since the federal government is borrowing money to pay current Social Security benefits, the program must be contributing to annual deficits and accumulated debt.

Here is what the fact checkers have overlooked.

The Congressional Budget Office explains that our nation has two types of debts; those owed to the public and those the government owes itself. Debt to the public is owed to investors who have purchased Treasury securities. Debts the government owes itself are IOUs held by various government trust funds that have had surplus revenues in the past. Of the estimated $16.3 trillion debt the federal government had accumulated by the end of 2012, $11.5 trillion was held by the public and $4.8 trillion was held by various government trusts. The largest trust, the OASDI Trust Fund, had estimated "assets" of $2.7 trillion.

Of course, the idea of a trust fund "asset" is controversial. After all, this is money the government owes itself. I think of it this way. Trust funds are not assets to the federal government because the assets in any given fund are exactly offset by liabilities owed by the Treasury Department; their net value to the federal government is zero. However, the OASDI Trust Fund (for example) is an asset for the Social Security Administration. That is, it represents a legitimate claim on the treasury backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.

When the Social Security program has a cash deficit (as it does currently), the Social Security Trustees request repayment for some of the Treasury securities (the IOUs) they purchased in the past. As the fact checkers have correctly observed, the Treasury Department must borrow money to finance these payments. However, the new borrowing does not increase total debt because this transaction is more akin to refinancing existing debt than accumulating new debt.

Suppose you owe a $5,000 credit card bill and you take a home equity loan to pay off the credit card debt. You have not changed your total debt; you have refinanced the debt, transferring it from one financial instrument (and one creditor) to another. Much the same can be said about repaying the OASDI Trust Fund. The fund's assets are composed of debts already accounted for as part of the nation's total debt. When the Treasury Department borrows money to pay current Social Security benefits, the debt owed to the Social Security Administration is repaid, refinanced, and transferred to whoever purchases Treasury securities.

Of course, the cost of refinancing the debt is a key concern. However, the only scenario in which repaying the OASDI Trust Fund can increase the nation's debt is if interest rates are higher now than they were when the original debt was incurred. Interest rates are presently quite low (the rate on 10-year Treasury Bonds is around 2 percent). Given current market conditions, the more plausible argument is that refinancing OASDI Trust Fund debt has reduced the nation's debt slightly by reducing interest costs.

Although current and future cash deficits in the Social Security program do contribute to the annual federal budget deficit, they do not contribute to the nation's debt. The new deficit spending is offset by reductions in old debts. This will remain true so long as the OASDI Trust Fund has "assets" that are counted as part of the nation's accumulated debt and interest rates on Treasury securities remain low.

The fact checkers should check again.

testPromoTitleReplace testPromoDekReplace Join HuffPost Today! No thanks.