Swedish Court Rules in Favor of Chabad Representatives

Chabad-Lubavitch representatives to Gothenburg, Sweden have a right to educate their children in accordance with their religious faith. The unanimous decision of the appellate court followed the Namdars' complaints against city authorities fining them for homeschooling their children.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.

Chabad-Lubavitch representatives to Gothenburg, Sweden have a right to educate their children in accordance with their religious faith. The unanimous decision of the appellate court followed the Namdars' complaints against city authorities fining them for homeschooling their children.

In its verdict the court recognized that the Namdars, who are both educators, have been providing their children with a "very satisfactory alternative" (through the International Shluchim Online School and private lessons) to standard Swedish schools while meeting their religious needs.

"I'm grateful to G-d for the insight and sensitivity of the judges, ruling as they did with respect and appreciation for religious freedom, and allowing us to provide our children with the kind of Jewish education and yiddishkeit that we want for them," said Rabbi Alexander Namdar.

A breaking report about the case on lubavitch.com last year generated wide exposure, provoking an international outcry noted by the judge last month. In Chana Namdar , Rochel Namdar, Shterna Namdar, Rivka Namdar vs. Gothenburg City, Rabbi and Leah Namdar appealed an earlier ruling that would force them to enroll their children in Swedish schools. School authorities claimed they were in their right, enforcing law reforms stating that "religion is not considered important" as a reason for homeschooling.

In the nine-page verdict, the court ruled that the "government is deciding that the recent change to the law [that religion is not regarded as a valid reason] cannot stand in contravention to Sweden's international obligation." The decision's ramifications cut straight to the issue of a state's obligations to protect the religious freedoms of its citizens.

Attorney Richard Backenroth, who represented the Namdars, said, "With this decision the court is correcting the ignorance of Swedish clerical officers." It is, he said, "a very happy day for all of us. This ruling is a victory for humanity."

Testifying for the Namdars, Guy Linderman, who has been active in Swedish politics for many years, and who supported the law when it was drafted, emphatically objected to its application in the case of the Namdar children. These children, he explained, enjoy a high level education, and have gone on to study abroad, becoming teachers and earning advanced degrees.

The law was originally motivated by concern for Sweden's immigrant children, "many of who were denied an education, and had grown up illiterate, incapable of signing their names." This is clearly not the situation here, he said, and applying the law in this way is mindless.

For the Namdars, who are dedicated to advancing Jewish education, Jewish awareness and faith in G-d in a culture that is decidedly atheistic and hostile to religion, this was a resounding triumph.

A pivotal moment in the case came toward the end, when Leah Namdar offered her own comments. Speaking passionately, she said that the law recently enacted in Sweden threatens the religious freedom of individuals protected under European and international law.

"Belief in G-d is the bedrock of a healthy society," said the mother of 11.

Although they were threatened with hefty fines for every day that they they failed to deliver their children to a Swedish school beginning last Feb. 1, which were now dismissed, the Namdars did not interrupt their children's schooling. Four of their daughters and their youngest son are studying at home through an international Jewish online school and private tutoring.

According to Attorney Backenroth, city authorities may try to appeal the ruling. "But the court was very clear as to why it reached this decision, so the Supreme Court may not be willing to accept the case on appeal," he said.

Following the decision, Rabbi Yehuda Krinsky, Chairman of the Educational and Social Services divisions at Chabad-Lubavitch Headquarters issued a statement expressing gratitude for the decision. "It is a manifestation of the responsibility of government to protect and cherish these values so vital to life and society," the statement said.

Popular in the Community

Close

What's Hot